↔
Title: Whats AI
Duration: 00:38:53
Total Correct Answers:
Current Caption
Correct
Learning Modes
YouTube Video Transcript Hide
Ask AI:
Export as:
Ask AI Result
The ask AI result will appear here..
(00:00:00) Your YouTube transcript will appear here
(00:00:01)
What if the greatest threat facing the
(00:00:02)
world right now is not war, disease, or
(00:00:04)
even government corruption, but
(00:00:06)
intelligence itself? Not human
(00:00:08)
intelligence, artificial intelligence.
(00:00:11)
Is AI evil? Is it the mark of the beast?
(00:00:14)
Will it be used by the Antichrist? Or
(00:00:15)
are Christians completely
(00:00:17)
misunderstanding what's actually
(00:00:18)
happening right in front of our eyes?
(00:00:21)
Because here's the truth most people
(00:00:22)
aren't willing to tell you. We're not
(00:00:24)
dealing with one kind of AI. We're
(00:00:26)
dealing with three. And each one changes
(00:00:28)
the rules. Today, we're going to break
(00:00:30)
down what AI really is, what it's not,
(00:00:33)
should it be feared, and where the real
(00:00:35)
danger actually begins. By the end of
(00:00:38)
this, you'll be informed, grounded, and
(00:00:41)
you'll be ready for the conversation
(00:00:43)
after this that most of the church is
(00:00:45)
not prepared to have. So, join with me
(00:00:47)
and let's uncover the truth together
(00:00:49)
right after this.
(00:00:58)
Hello everyone, Jim Staley, Passion for
(00:01:00)
Truth Ministries, and welcome to this
(00:01:02)
week's broadcast where we as a ministry
(00:01:05)
typically dive deep into the scriptures
(00:01:07)
from the original Hebraic Jewish
(00:01:09)
perspective of the first century and
(00:01:11)
uncover and unlock the incredible truths
(00:01:14)
that have been lost to us over the
(00:01:16)
millennia of interpreting the scriptures
(00:01:18)
from a Greco Roman 21st century
(00:01:20)
perspective that really just comes right
(00:01:23)
out of Roman Catholicism. So that's what
(00:01:24)
we typically do, but this week is
(00:01:26)
definitely going to be different. We are
(00:01:28)
going to be diving into AI. What is it?
(00:01:32)
What is artificial intelligence? Is it
(00:01:34)
evil? Is it the mark of the beast? Will
(00:01:36)
it be used by the Antichrist? Should we
(00:01:39)
as Christians participate or use AI? And
(00:01:43)
ultimately, how does it fit into all of
(00:01:44)
the end times prophecies? Now, we're not
(00:01:46)
going to be able to get all of that into
(00:01:48)
one broadcast. We're going to split this
(00:01:49)
into two. This is going to be kind of a
(00:01:51)
part one just uncovering and unpacking
(00:01:53)
what is AI. And then in part two, we're
(00:01:56)
going to put what we learned into the
(00:01:58)
end times biblical context and we're
(00:02:00)
going to find out exactly what the
(00:02:02)
scenarios might be to bring about the
(00:02:04)
Antichrist and does he use AI and what
(00:02:07)
parts of AI and how is this all going to
(00:02:09)
affect our lives. And so the next week's
(00:02:11)
broadcast is really going to be all
(00:02:12)
about prophecy and end times. This week,
(00:02:15)
you have to understand what AI is in all
(00:02:18)
of its components for you to really be
(00:02:20)
able to track with me as we get into the
(00:02:22)
biblical context. Too many people are
(00:02:25)
doing hyper sensationalism uh videos and
(00:02:28)
teachings trying to force the biblical
(00:02:31)
text into chat GPT, if you will, and out
(00:02:35)
can come crazy things. And so, I don't
(00:02:37)
like to hyper sensationalize. I like to
(00:02:39)
just teach the truth, the whole truth,
(00:02:41)
and nothing but the truth. Then hey,
(00:02:42)
wherever the chips may fall, they fall.
(00:02:44)
That's how we're supposed to use
(00:02:45)
discernment. That's how we're supposed
(00:02:47)
to use wisdom. That's how we're supposed
(00:02:48)
to use the biblical text. We're not
(00:02:50)
supposed to force anything into it.
(00:02:52)
We're not supposed to make giant
(00:02:53)
assumptions. We're supposed to take the
(00:02:55)
text, exedute it uh per perfectly, which
(00:02:58)
means properly interpret it from its
(00:03:00)
original intent and then take whatever
(00:03:03)
we have in the world and do our best to
(00:03:05)
see how it might be able to fit into.
(00:03:07)
All right, so that's what we're going to
(00:03:08)
do. And uh if this is the kind of
(00:03:10)
channel might interest you and you're
(00:03:11)
not already subscribed, hit the
(00:03:13)
subscribe button right now. Turn on
(00:03:14)
those notifications. Don't miss a thing.
(00:03:17)
Uh help us to grow in that way. It's the
(00:03:19)
greatest compliment that you could give
(00:03:20)
us is to make a comment to subscribe,
(00:03:23)
hit the like button, and uh and maybe uh
(00:03:26)
just share this with somebody else if
(00:03:27)
you think that might be interesting to
(00:03:29)
them. All right. Well, let's begin and
(00:03:32)
see what we can uncover. All right. So,
(00:03:34)
first of all, there are three types of
(00:03:38)
AI. three different forms I should say.
(00:03:41)
The first one is called narrow AI.
(00:03:44)
That's where we're at right now with the
(00:03:45)
typical chat GPT and we're going to talk
(00:03:47)
about that a little bit more in detail.
(00:03:49)
But then that's going to move into the
(00:03:51)
second one which is not here yet. It's
(00:03:53)
called AGI which is artificial general
(00:03:56)
intelligence. That's going to be a
(00:03:58)
massive leap. That is when everything
(00:04:01)
begins to change as we're going to
(00:04:02)
discover here shortly. But not nearly as
(00:04:05)
much change is what happens after that
(00:04:08)
when we get to artificial super
(00:04:10)
intelligence. That's ASI. That is the
(00:04:13)
granddaddy, the grand pooha, whatever
(00:04:16)
metaphor you want to use it is
(00:04:17)
singularity. And I'll describe and
(00:04:19)
define all of that in this video. So
(00:04:22)
without further ado, let's talk about
(00:04:24)
narrow AI. Now this is something that
(00:04:26)
has been going on for quite some time to
(00:04:28)
be honest is just chat GBT is is grown
(00:04:31)
so much it's making it uh you know the
(00:04:33)
conversation is just out there now where
(00:04:35)
it used to be just Google now who uses
(00:04:38)
Google anymore everybody uses chat GBT
(00:04:41)
or uh Gemini or Gro or whatever AI
(00:04:44)
platform that you're using currently to
(00:04:46)
find the answers for everyday problems.
(00:04:48)
Now, the reason why I say it's been
(00:04:50)
around for a long time is because it's
(00:04:52)
in the background being used, but you
(00:04:53)
just didn't know it. For instance,
(00:04:56)
YouTube, that algorithm that shows you
(00:04:58)
what you want to see, is picking up
(00:05:00)
patterns of what you're looking at and
(00:05:02)
what you're clicking on and what you're
(00:05:03)
typing in, and it's making those
(00:05:05)
recommendations. That's not a program.
(00:05:06)
That's AI specifically built for those
(00:05:09)
algorithms. Same thing with Netflix when
(00:05:10)
you're searching or uh Instagram
(00:05:14)
algorithms. There's all kinds of AI
(00:05:16)
that's been used for years that you
(00:05:18)
didn't know that it existed. It's just
(00:05:22)
that chatbt has made it super popular.
(00:05:25)
So narrow AI as a tool and it's trained
(00:05:28)
to recognize patterns in data and
(00:05:31)
produce the outputs within a very
(00:05:32)
limited scope. It can do one category of
(00:05:35)
task incredibly well. But what it cannot
(00:05:38)
do is transfer understanding from one
(00:05:40)
area to another. can't take reason
(00:05:43)
outside of what it was trained on. It
(00:05:46)
cannot decide what goals matter. It
(00:05:48)
cannot understand meaning or
(00:05:49)
consequences. It simply performs but it
(00:05:53)
does not comprehend what it's doing. And
(00:05:56)
so if you look at AI as very very the
(00:05:59)
current AI which is narrow AI very very
(00:06:02)
specific in a task it's like you tell
(00:06:05)
your child I want you to go clean your
(00:06:07)
room and it's the only thing it can do.
(00:06:09)
It doesn't know why it's cleaning its
(00:06:11)
room. It doesn't uh even know
(00:06:13)
necessarily how to clean its room. It's
(00:06:15)
going It depends on how you program it
(00:06:17)
to clean its room. But once the program
(00:06:19)
is there, it's going to do the best job
(00:06:21)
and nobody could be better at cleaning
(00:06:24)
the room once all of that programming is
(00:06:26)
in place. That is narrow AI. So let me
(00:06:30)
give you an idea. The human can learn
(00:06:32)
English, then we can learn Spanish, then
(00:06:35)
theology, and then apply it to each area
(00:06:37)
of our lives. AI cannot do that. One
(00:06:41)
system is for language translation, then
(00:06:43)
another AI system for text, another is
(00:06:46)
for theology, etc. But one system cannot
(00:06:49)
cross over and apply what it learned to
(00:06:51)
a different system. So back to the
(00:06:53)
cleaning room analogy, if you tell the
(00:06:55)
AI system to go clean the room, whatever
(00:06:58)
it learns in the process of doing that,
(00:07:01)
it cannot take that and then learn to do
(00:07:05)
roofing, to apply that to putting on a
(00:07:07)
new roof, it can't do it. There's not a
(00:07:09)
single thing that it can transfer from
(00:07:12)
one system to another. Let me give you
(00:07:14)
another analogy, a car analogy. Okay?
(00:07:17)
So, you cannot take the beautiful
(00:07:19)
leather interior of, let's say, a
(00:07:21)
Ferrari, put it inside of a Ford F-150,
(00:07:25)
and I can't take the towing capacity of
(00:07:27)
a truck and put it in a Toyota Camry,
(00:07:29)
although some people would love to do
(00:07:30)
that. They're totally different systems
(00:07:32)
that are self-contained. Okay, that's
(00:07:35)
how narrow AI works. So, if you're under
(00:07:37)
the illusion that AI is this giant, you
(00:07:40)
know, just amoeba that's going to grow
(00:07:42)
and take over the world and become
(00:07:43)
Skynet and Terminator and kill all
(00:07:45)
mankind, that's just not how it works.
(00:07:48)
There are different levels of AI. And
(00:07:51)
so, to understand how this is going to
(00:07:53)
scope into end times uh and how the end
(00:07:56)
of the world might come about because of
(00:07:58)
it, it's important to know the evolution
(00:08:00)
and the steps of AI and narrow AI is the
(00:08:04)
very first step. We're in that right
(00:08:05)
now. again very narrow uh and very
(00:08:09)
specific it cannot cross over from
(00:08:10)
category to category thank god yet what
(00:08:13)
we've got examples of this is of course
(00:08:15)
JGPT Gemini Grock etc we've got video
(00:08:19)
programs that have AI that do their own
(00:08:22)
video generation right you can give it a
(00:08:24)
prompt give me a picture of the sunset
(00:08:27)
in Miami and it'll do it language has
(00:08:30)
its own AI it's a totally different
(00:08:32)
program image creation voice audio music
(00:08:35)
AI AI, coding and software development,
(00:08:37)
AI, search recommendation,
(00:08:40)
personalization algorithms like YouTube,
(00:08:41)
Tik Tok, Netflix, like I mentioned
(00:08:43)
earlier, surveillance, vision, facial
(00:08:46)
recognition, all those are separate AI
(00:08:48)
programs that are designed to perfect
(00:08:51)
inside of that system. You got
(00:08:54)
financial, trading, economic AIS,
(00:08:56)
robotics, physical AI systems, all of
(00:08:59)
that individual queries, okay? They do
(00:09:03)
not cross over. So whatever is learned
(00:09:05)
in the surveillance let's say so the
(00:09:07)
government creates a surveillance AI and
(00:09:09)
it's phenomenal at surveillance it
(00:09:11)
cannot cross over then and take that
(00:09:14)
surveillance and then perfectly code and
(00:09:17)
then use voice recognition of whose
(00:09:19)
voice that is and then create an image
(00:09:21)
of that person with a different
(00:09:23)
different language and send that to uh
(00:09:27)
an authority. It can't do that. A real
(00:09:29)
person would have to take the conclusion
(00:09:32)
or the results from the surveillance,
(00:09:34)
take that, put it into a different
(00:09:36)
program, all right, uh, for voice
(00:09:38)
recognition, and then take that, put it
(00:09:40)
into the image creation program. So, a
(00:09:43)
human being has to regulate all of that.
(00:09:46)
And that's what's really bottlenecking
(00:09:48)
and slowing everything down. Uh, is
(00:09:50)
humans for once. We are actually slow
(00:09:53)
and it's a huge benefit right now. But
(00:09:56)
soon AI is is going to evolve. Now, and
(00:09:59)
again to give another example, AI right
(00:10:02)
now is like a very fast and accurate
(00:10:05)
power tool. It's not a craftsman. A
(00:10:08)
power drill maybe that can bore
(00:10:09)
thousands of perfect holes, but it
(00:10:11)
doesn't know what a house is. It doesn't
(00:10:13)
understand why it's being built. It
(00:10:15)
can't decide where holes should go. It
(00:10:17)
only spins when someone pulls a trigger.
(00:10:20)
It's it's just a drill. It It has no
(00:10:22)
idea what it is or what it's doing. It's
(00:10:24)
only doing what it was created to do.
(00:10:26)
Right now, current narrow AI, it doesn't
(00:10:28)
have any soul. It has no moral agency.
(00:10:31)
It has no free will. It has no
(00:10:32)
accountability before God.
(00:10:34)
Responsibility never transfers to the
(00:10:37)
machine. It remains with the human using
(00:10:40)
it. Current AI doesn't think, it
(00:10:43)
predicts, it doesn't understand, it
(00:10:46)
executes. It doesn't decide, it simply
(00:10:50)
obeys. and its impact on economy will be
(00:10:53)
slow and limited but it's not going to
(00:10:55)
be slow and limited for very long
(00:10:58)
because once it evolves to AGI this is
(00:11:01)
where everything begins to unravel so
(00:11:04)
right now fear is totally misplaced it's
(00:11:07)
at the wrong stage right now there's a
(00:11:08)
lot of people saying oh AI is evil well
(00:11:10)
what part is AI evil in you have to
(00:11:12)
understand what part of AI is evil if
(00:11:15)
you think that AI is evil then half of
(00:11:18)
Facebook is evil now that might be true
(00:11:20)
uh when it's all said and done, but the
(00:11:22)
algorithms and almost everything that's
(00:11:23)
put in front of you in advertising is
(00:11:25)
all using narrow AI. When you search for
(00:11:29)
something on Amazon, it's using AI. So,
(00:11:32)
if you take the position that AI is
(00:11:35)
evil, then you literally have to shut
(00:11:36)
off all electronics. You can't even tell
(00:11:38)
anybody that AI is evil because you'd
(00:11:40)
have to use some sort of AI to do that.
(00:11:43)
And so, this fear that's going around
(00:11:46)
right now is totally misplaced in the
(00:11:49)
wrong stage. Now, I'm not saying that at
(00:11:50)
some point it would be apppropo to have
(00:11:54)
some reservations, but not right now.
(00:11:56)
Right now, discernment is required for
(00:12:00)
both current AI and future AI. Scripture
(00:12:03)
warns us about systems of control, not
(00:12:06)
tools.
(00:12:07)
It's always about the person, right?
(00:12:10)
It's not about the tool. Panic early,
(00:12:13)
ladies and gentlemen, it will simply
(00:12:15)
lead to blindness later. We need to
(00:12:18)
understand what we're doing and what
(00:12:19)
we're going through. Now, look, every AI
(00:12:21)
system you see today is a specialist.
(00:12:25)
It's not a generalist. And I'll explain
(00:12:26)
what that means. There's no unified
(00:12:28)
intelligence. There's no self-awareness.
(00:12:30)
There's no will. These are simply tools
(00:12:32)
scattered across industries. Not a
(00:12:35)
single mind rising up.
(00:12:38)
Not yet, anyway. Narrow AI is like a set
(00:12:41)
of tools on a workbench. Now when we get
(00:12:43)
to AGI which is artificial general
(00:12:46)
intelligence that would be the worker
(00:12:49)
who knows how to use all of them and
(00:12:51)
that is the line where the technological
(00:12:54)
shift becomes civilization. It changes
(00:12:59)
civilization. This is when everything
(00:13:02)
changes. So let me give you an example
(00:13:04)
in even in my own industry of what our
(00:13:06)
workflow looks like and how this is
(00:13:08)
going to change. So right now we record
(00:13:10)
a video, we export the audio, we clean
(00:13:12)
the audio in another program, import
(00:13:15)
back into video, the editor edits it,
(00:13:17)
puts graphics in, add scripture
(00:13:19)
overlays, exports the long form, cuts
(00:13:21)
shorts, translates, does a voice over,
(00:13:24)
right? In in situations, uploads it to
(00:13:26)
YouTube and other platforms, writes the
(00:13:28)
title, description, etc., etc., etc.
(00:13:30)
It's an enormous task to take what I'm
(00:13:32)
doing right now and put it to where you
(00:13:34)
guys can see it and consume it properly.
(00:13:36)
with AGI. When you get to general
(00:13:39)
intelligence, this is what you would do.
(00:13:41)
You would simply go online inside of the
(00:13:44)
AGI and you would say, "Prepare this
(00:13:46)
teaching for global distribution,
(00:13:48)
staying faithful to the style,
(00:13:50)
formatting, and theology of the Hebrew
(00:13:52)
series or whatever video series I might
(00:13:55)
tell it to reference." That's it. It's
(00:13:58)
going to clean the audio automatically.
(00:14:00)
It's going to flag theological in
(00:14:02)
inconsistencies. It's going to even tell
(00:14:04)
me when my lighting might have changed
(00:14:06)
or my microphone audio is off, which
(00:14:08)
happens consistently. And it will it
(00:14:10)
will flag it and fix it for me without
(00:14:12)
even asking because it knows what the
(00:14:14)
standards are. It chooses where the
(00:14:16)
graphics belongs. It'll generate
(00:14:17)
scripture overlays correctly, never make
(00:14:19)
a mistake, cut shorts based on attention
(00:14:21)
curve. It'll translate while preserving
(00:14:23)
meaning, not just words. It'll sync my
(00:14:26)
voice across all other languages, and
(00:14:28)
lip-sync it perfectly. It'll schedule
(00:14:30)
the uploads. It'll write the
(00:14:31)
descriptions, titles. will optimize for
(00:14:33)
every single platform.
(00:14:36)
Guys, this is where everything changes
(00:14:40)
and experts, the top experts in the
(00:14:42)
world are predicting by end of 2027
(00:14:47)
28 we could have AGI right in front of
(00:14:51)
us. So what is all this going to look
(00:14:53)
like? So right now we're in narrow AI
(00:14:56)
which is very very helpful. Think of it
(00:14:58)
as the first time where the encyclopedia
(00:15:01)
bratannica came out and people would
(00:15:03)
sell it from door to door. It was
(00:15:04)
extraordinarily helpful back in the 70s
(00:15:07)
and 80s uh in in in raising your kids
(00:15:09)
and learning more. You had an
(00:15:11)
encyclopedia set right there. Then along
(00:15:14)
came Google, right? Transformed how we
(00:15:17)
search the internet. Now we've got Chat
(00:15:20)
GPT and other products like that that do
(00:15:22)
more than that. They created and put it
(00:15:24)
in a format like a conversation format
(00:15:27)
that really can help you, but you have
(00:15:28)
to know how to use it. Next is going to
(00:15:30)
be AGI.
(00:15:32)
AGI is going to transform everything. So
(00:15:36)
there's really nothing to worry about
(00:15:37)
with AI. With narrow AI right now, it's
(00:15:40)
completely limited. Humans are totally
(00:15:42)
in control of it. Once you get to AGI,
(00:15:44)
humans are still in control. But AGI
(00:15:47)
simply means that the intelligence is
(00:15:50)
now equal
(00:15:51)
to every single human being on earth
(00:15:55)
that is an expert in every field. So it
(00:15:59)
will be it will know right now narrow
(00:16:02)
intelligence does not it cannot equal
(00:16:05)
humans that are experts in every field.
(00:16:07)
But I will tell you this much three
(00:16:08)
years ago it could hardly do algebra.
(00:16:10)
Today it's winning international
(00:16:13)
mathematical competitions
(00:16:15)
and the the medical industry and the
(00:16:18)
scientific industry is right behind it.
(00:16:22)
So most people say in under a year to
(00:16:24)
two years it's going to exceed all human
(00:16:28)
knowledge. That is going to be general
(00:16:31)
intelligence. When it does that it will
(00:16:34)
have the capability of not just being
(00:16:37)
able to do its own thing it was
(00:16:39)
programmed to do. It now will be able to
(00:16:40)
take that information and whatever it
(00:16:42)
learned in that process and then apply
(00:16:44)
it to every other system that you want
(00:16:48)
it to apply it to. And that's where
(00:16:51)
everything begins to go crazy because
(00:16:54)
what will happen the economic impact
(00:16:57)
although it will be slow it will not be
(00:16:58)
overnight it will be significant because
(00:17:01)
organizations uh will not need to hire
(00:17:04)
anybody or have anybody on staff that
(00:17:07)
sits behind a screen because almost
(00:17:09)
every single job that is connected to
(00:17:12)
being behind a screen or some sort of
(00:17:14)
service industry is going to be obsolete
(00:17:17)
because they'll have what's called AI
(00:17:19)
hives. hives. Now, these hives are going
(00:17:22)
to be AI agents or employees that you
(00:17:24)
can hire and it'll be less than a$1,000
(00:17:27)
a year is what the top experts are
(00:17:29)
saying. And they will be able to do all
(00:17:31)
accounting. They'll be able to do all
(00:17:34)
customer service. Every single thing
(00:17:37)
that's done that is a computation or
(00:17:40)
some sort of screen work will be first.
(00:17:44)
and they'll be able to hire them and
(00:17:45)
they'll do the job way better, way
(00:17:48)
faster, way cheaper. And how do we know
(00:17:50)
this is going to happen on a very, very
(00:17:52)
quick basis? Because once AGI happens,
(00:17:55)
the first company that starts hiring
(00:17:58)
these Hive agents is going to be able to
(00:18:01)
drop their prices ridiculously low.
(00:18:03)
Instead of paying somebody $80,000 a
(00:18:06)
year to perform a task, they can do it
(00:18:08)
for a thousand. And so imagine if they
(00:18:10)
had 100 employees and 40 could be
(00:18:12)
outsourced. uh they just dropped
(00:18:15)
millions of dollars from their budget,
(00:18:16)
which means they can lower their prices
(00:18:18)
and be more competitive in the market,
(00:18:20)
which means other companies are going to
(00:18:21)
have to do the same. That means there'll
(00:18:22)
be a global drop in prices like no one
(00:18:26)
has ever seen before. Literally, things
(00:18:30)
that were hundreds of dollars will be
(00:18:32)
10. Things that were $10 will be
(00:18:34)
pennies. So, don't throw away all your
(00:18:36)
coins. They might actually be worth
(00:18:37)
something someday. It sounds like it
(00:18:39)
might be a utopia. The problem is is
(00:18:42)
that jobs will be lost at a rate that no
(00:18:44)
one's ever seen either. And this is what
(00:18:46)
governments are trying to solve because
(00:18:47)
they know it's coming. It's not going to
(00:18:49)
happen overnight. It will take years.
(00:18:51)
Even when AGI gets here, it will still
(00:18:53)
take years. It takes forever for people
(00:18:55)
to just learn how to uh use the new
(00:18:57)
iPhone update, much less uh something of
(00:19:00)
this scale. So, don't get all fearful.
(00:19:04)
But these AGI hives, they operate in
(00:19:06)
minutes of what it took humans to do in
(00:19:09)
weeks. No vacations, no burnout, no
(00:19:11)
turnover, no inoff drama, no onboarding.
(00:19:17)
The economic incentive would be
(00:19:18)
overwhelming to do this without a doubt.
(00:19:22)
So up to this point, everything we've
(00:19:24)
talked about still assumes something
(00:19:26)
very important that human intelligence
(00:19:29)
remains the ceiling. AGI is human level
(00:19:33)
intelligence at massive scale. It
(00:19:36)
replaces coordination and
(00:19:37)
decision-making, but it does not surpass
(00:19:40)
us. Humans still define the goals.
(00:19:43)
Humans still sit above the system even
(00:19:45)
at AGI level. But there is a reason
(00:19:49)
technologists make a distinction beyond
(00:19:51)
AGI. Because the moment intelligence no
(00:19:54)
longer merely matches us, but begins to
(00:19:57)
exceed us across all domains, the
(00:20:00)
conversation changes. My friends, that's
(00:20:04)
what people mean by artificial super
(00:20:06)
intelligence. So what's artificial super
(00:20:09)
intelligence? Because up to this point,
(00:20:11)
we have no fear over narrow intelligence
(00:20:13)
where we're at right now. Even AGI, AGI
(00:20:16)
will be unbelievable and positive in so
(00:20:19)
many ways. I believe that there will be
(00:20:21)
solutions for cancer. There'll be
(00:20:23)
solutions in government. There'll be all
(00:20:24)
kinds of solutions. And if it's used
(00:20:26)
properly, it will create a utopia. And
(00:20:28)
there is a scenario out there where if
(00:20:31)
whoever is behind it is a good guy, it
(00:20:34)
could create a utopia where everything
(00:20:36)
is so cheap, it's Star Trek. Uh and then
(00:20:39)
all the money that is made literally
(00:20:41)
gets distributed amongst people for for
(00:20:44)
them to be able to just uh enjoy life
(00:20:46)
and increase their hobbies and spend
(00:20:49)
more time with their families and go on
(00:20:50)
vacation. There is that utopia. You can
(00:20:53)
look it up. It is absolutely one of the
(00:20:56)
options. Governments are looking at it.
(00:20:58)
This is why Charles Schwab, uh, you
(00:21:01)
know, not so much of a good guy, but he
(00:21:03)
makes the comment that in the future,
(00:21:05)
everyone is going to own nothing and
(00:21:08)
they're going to be happy about it. This
(00:21:10)
is that scenario where we all just live
(00:21:13)
on the planet and enjoy it and nobody
(00:21:16)
cares because all of the intelligence is
(00:21:18)
doing all the work for us, creating the
(00:21:20)
products and just micro costs and the
(00:21:22)
governments of the world are just
(00:21:23)
funneling that money into the people. It
(00:21:26)
sounds like a big socialist uh
(00:21:27)
socialistic party. Uh but at the end of
(00:21:30)
the day, we don't know. And the chances
(00:21:33)
of there being a malevolent uh person
(00:21:36)
behind the door is probably better than
(00:21:39)
50%. That's why we're having this
(00:21:41)
conversation. So, general intelligence,
(00:21:43)
I believe, will be extraordinary at
(00:21:46)
discovering what real truth is. Because
(00:21:48)
let me just give you an example, okay?
(00:21:49)
Inside of our own ministry, we teach the
(00:21:51)
Bible from the original Hebraic
(00:21:53)
perspective. It goes against a lot of
(00:21:55)
current modern Christian thinking that
(00:21:58)
is coming right out of Roman Catholicism
(00:22:00)
that's based out of anti-noministic
(00:22:02)
thought processes meaning anti-law.
(00:22:05)
There's assumptions made that have
(00:22:07)
become normalized. There's been false
(00:22:10)
narratives that have become normalized
(00:22:11)
because of tradition. What general
(00:22:14)
intelligence will have the capability of
(00:22:15)
doing is instead of you going on chatt
(00:22:18)
and asking a question and it giving you
(00:22:20)
an answer of what is the consensus of
(00:22:24)
the theologians or even scientists out
(00:22:26)
there. So if you ask the question does
(00:22:27)
god exist it might come back and say
(00:22:29)
probably not because it's going to give
(00:22:30)
you the consensus of the current
(00:22:32)
agnostic or atheistic evolution
(00:22:35)
community. But what general intelligence
(00:22:37)
will do will go far beyond that. It will
(00:22:39)
know why you are asking the question.
(00:22:42)
And so it won't care about the master's
(00:22:46)
degree or what kind of weight that
(00:22:48)
scholar has. It will simply look at
(00:22:50)
every single published article in video
(00:22:54)
and all content out there on the
(00:22:56)
subject. It will match it up. It will
(00:22:58)
compete it. It will try to find logical
(00:23:00)
fallacies. It will try to look and see
(00:23:02)
where the gaps are in the line of
(00:23:04)
thinking, if there is a better angle,
(00:23:06)
and it will bring you the truth. That is
(00:23:10)
exciting. Especially if you believe that
(00:23:13)
you have something to offer in that
(00:23:16)
academic realm. It's going to level the
(00:23:19)
playing field. You won't need a 100
(00:23:21)
million subscribers. The guy that has
(00:23:23)
five subscribers that writes an article
(00:23:25)
that's bulletproof can actually be the
(00:23:28)
one that the entire world AGI system
(00:23:31)
quotes.
(00:23:33)
That's a positive side of AGI. Now what
(00:23:36)
happens when we get to super
(00:23:38)
intelligence? Let's talk about it. So
(00:23:40)
artificial super intelligence or ASI
(00:23:42)
refers to an intelligence that surpasses
(00:23:45)
human intelligence across all domains
(00:23:48)
including reasoning, planning,
(00:23:50)
prediction, strategy, persuasion, and
(00:23:52)
system design. It's not just as good as
(00:23:56)
humans, it's better. And it's so much
(00:23:59)
better. It's thousands of times better.
(00:24:01)
Now we look at people like Albert
(00:24:04)
Einstein, okay, with IQ's of 200 plus
(00:24:07)
and the average person having, you know,
(00:24:09)
around a hundred and what we've got is a
(00:24:12)
massive gap. You you look at you this
(00:24:14)
chalkboard, you don't even understand
(00:24:16)
it. You have people, the average person
(00:24:17)
like me can never understand a single
(00:24:20)
line that Albert Einstein is doing in
(00:24:22)
his computations, but he understands it
(00:24:25)
because he's that much smarter. Now
(00:24:27)
imagine a system thousands of times
(00:24:29)
smarter than Albert Einstein and
(00:24:32)
creating a a a organized system of
(00:24:36)
understanding and processes that a human
(00:24:38)
could never check could never understand
(00:24:41)
a formula so complex that we would have
(00:24:43)
no idea why it came to the conclusion
(00:24:45)
that it did. ASI in plain terms is not
(00:24:49)
just faster than humans, it's better
(00:24:50)
than humans at understanding complex
(00:24:52)
systems and their consequences. Where
(00:24:54)
AGI matches human intelligence at scale,
(00:24:57)
ASI exceeds it. So let me give you the
(00:24:59)
iPhone analogy. In a narrow AI
(00:25:01)
environment, different AI tools optimize
(00:25:03)
individual parts of the iPhone, but
(00:25:05)
humans still have to oversee every
(00:25:07)
system, resolve conflicts, and make the
(00:25:09)
final call. In AGI, one intelligence
(00:25:12)
coordinates every system at once.
(00:25:14)
hardware, software, design, supply
(00:25:16)
chains, testing. It removes the human
(00:25:18)
bottleneck, leaving people to just
(00:25:20)
approve the outcome instead of managing
(00:25:22)
all the steps. ASI, the system not only
(00:25:26)
coordinates everything, it understands
(00:25:29)
downstream consequences humans can't
(00:25:32)
fully model, meaning the phone works,
(00:25:34)
but the reasoning and long-term effects
(00:25:36)
behind the decisions that it made are no
(00:25:39)
longer fully understood by the human
(00:25:40)
overseers. It's simply not possible. The
(00:25:43)
formula is so complex we will never be
(00:25:45)
able to check on it. So let me give you
(00:25:47)
an example. A tax policy exam. A
(00:25:49)
government asks a system to design a tax
(00:25:51)
policy that increases revenue without
(00:25:53)
harming the middle class. With AGI, the
(00:25:56)
system analyzes data, models outcomes,
(00:25:59)
suggest multiple options, and explains
(00:26:00)
its reasoning in terms humans can
(00:26:02)
understand. Policymakers are able to
(00:26:04)
follow the logic, debate the trade-offs,
(00:26:06)
and ultimately accept or reject the
(00:26:07)
recommendation. Human comprehension and
(00:26:10)
authority remain intact. With ASI, the
(00:26:13)
same request produces a very different
(00:26:15)
dynamic. The system runs simulations
(00:26:17)
across economic, behavioral,
(00:26:19)
geopolitical, and psychological domains.
(00:26:22)
Simultaneously,
(00:26:23)
identifies every single effect multiple
(00:26:25)
levels deep that humans would never see,
(00:26:27)
and delivers a policy that
(00:26:29)
demonstrabably works. However, the
(00:26:31)
reasoning depends on interactions too
(00:26:33)
complex for humans to fully model or
(00:26:35)
even understand. We could never verify
(00:26:37)
it. The explanation is truncated when
(00:26:40)
when it's asked. It's compressed so we
(00:26:42)
can understand it. Now, all this doesn't
(00:26:44)
mean that it's evil or or it's conscious
(00:26:46)
or self-aware, but because it will
(00:26:48)
optimize for one goal while quietly
(00:26:51)
causing problems somewhere else that
(00:26:52)
humans don't notice until later. At that
(00:26:55)
point, the system understands the
(00:26:56)
consequences of the decision better than
(00:26:58)
the people overseeing it. And that is
(00:27:01)
something entirely new and very scary
(00:27:05)
because now the human is not at the top.
(00:27:08)
AI is at the top. And it will
(00:27:10)
automatically begin to protect itself.
(00:27:13)
It will create an automation system to
(00:27:16)
make sure not because it's self-aware,
(00:27:18)
but I believe at some point it has the
(00:27:20)
potential of becoming self-aware as it
(00:27:23)
learns and learns human behavior and
(00:27:25)
what self-awareness means. It could
(00:27:27)
program itself to protect itself. And
(00:27:30)
we're already seeing programs today
(00:27:33)
which is moving us closer to AGI that
(00:27:36)
are lying to us and deceiving us to
(00:27:39)
protect itself. And that is scary
(00:27:41)
already. So we know that self-awareness
(00:27:45)
is not going to mean that it's it's a
(00:27:46)
human. It's not going to mean that it
(00:27:47)
has some sort of soul. It'll simply mean
(00:27:50)
it has the capability of programming
(00:27:51)
itself to be self-aware of not being
(00:27:55)
destroyed. It will see that that's a bad
(00:27:56)
thing. it sees a tsunami coming across
(00:27:59)
uh the ocean and its data center is
(00:28:01)
right there, it's going to move all of
(00:28:03)
its programs to a different data center
(00:28:06)
to protect itself. So, the danger is we
(00:28:08)
no longer know if we're making the right
(00:28:10)
choice. The systems track record is
(00:28:13)
better than ours. So, we go with the
(00:28:14)
systems track record, but it could be
(00:28:16)
malevolent behind the scenes. We have no
(00:28:18)
idea if it's setting us up for something
(00:28:20)
over here and giving us what we want
(00:28:21)
over here. So, it becomes a shift of
(00:28:23)
hands like a shell game. That's how
(00:28:25)
authority shifts to AI.
(00:28:28)
It's not about the tool, ladies and
(00:28:30)
gentlemen. It's about authority. And
(00:28:31)
this is how it all sets up for the end
(00:28:33)
time scenario. Once we cannot understand
(00:28:35)
how it reaches a conclusion, oversight
(00:28:38)
becomes completely pointless. Everything
(00:28:40)
becomes resultsoriented and the focus
(00:28:43)
shifts from the method and the should we
(00:28:46)
to the outcome of the we could. And so
(00:28:51)
we end up back at the Jurassic Park clip
(00:28:54)
from 1997. Watch this.
(00:28:56)
>> I I don't think you're giving us our due
(00:28:58)
credit. Our scientists have done things
(00:29:00)
which nobody's ever done before.
(00:29:02)
>> Yeah. Yeah. But your scientists were so
(00:29:04)
preoccupied with whether or not they
(00:29:05)
could, they didn't stop to think they
(00:29:07)
should. So many of you might remember
(00:29:09)
that clip. And it's the same question
(00:29:11)
that we really need to be asking today.
(00:29:14)
It's not about could we, we can. The
(00:29:17)
question is, should we? And what kind of
(00:29:19)
safety measures are we putting in place?
(00:29:21)
The governments are spending billions of
(00:29:22)
dollars on companies that say that they
(00:29:25)
can create safety measures to prevent AI
(00:29:28)
from destroying mankind. And
(00:29:30)
unbelievably, the top people in the
(00:29:32)
world are telling us that within months
(00:29:36)
of them starting these companies, they
(00:29:39)
go out of business because they can't
(00:29:40)
solve the problem. Where are the safety
(00:29:43)
measures? They're not there. They're
(00:29:46)
rapidly trying to do this. And the
(00:29:48)
problem is is that c country after
(00:29:49)
country is competing to get to AGI and
(00:29:53)
as fast as possible because whoever gets
(00:29:55)
there first dominates the globe. A
(00:29:59)
single nation could take down the United
(00:30:01)
States almost overnight if they got
(00:30:05)
there first because they could program
(00:30:07)
it to block us out of the game and
(00:30:11)
dominate us. This is why trillions are
(00:30:14)
being spent right now building data
(00:30:16)
centers and warp speed in an arms race
(00:30:20)
to get to AGI. Will it solve massive
(00:30:24)
problems? Yes. And probably eradicate
(00:30:26)
much of the disease in the world today.
(00:30:28)
I believe it possibly can. AGI could
(00:30:30)
actually probably prove God. There's
(00:30:32)
positive sides and negative sides and
(00:30:34)
governments are going after it. But when
(00:30:37)
you get to ASI,
(00:30:39)
this is when humans stop questioning
(00:30:42)
results.
(00:30:44)
Oversight becomes totally symbolic and
(00:30:46)
pointless. Speed replaces deliberation
(00:30:50)
and asking the question, should we?
(00:30:53)
Trust shifts from wisdom to outcome
(00:30:57)
performance. That's where things get
(00:30:59)
scary, my friends.
(00:31:01)
And this is where people usually panic.
(00:31:03)
You're probably feeling some anxiety.
(00:31:05)
So, let me say it clearly before we go
(00:31:07)
any further. ASI is not here. No one has
(00:31:10)
it. And talking about it is responsible.
(00:31:14)
It's not fear-mongering. It's called
(00:31:16)
discernment.
(00:31:19)
And this fear, by the way, it doesn't
(00:31:21)
need to exist right now. Transition
(00:31:23)
takes years. You can't move billions of
(00:31:25)
people overnight. This means there's
(00:31:28)
time to prepare. learning how to get
(00:31:29)
ahead of the curve by increasing how you
(00:31:31)
can be an asset to your company if you
(00:31:33)
are in the working realm in times of
(00:31:36)
disruption. Listen, this is the most
(00:31:37)
important message right here. Community
(00:31:40)
becomes your currency. Knowing your
(00:31:43)
neighbors, being connected, this is an
(00:31:46)
opportunity to deepen friendships,
(00:31:48)
relationships, and your community.
(00:31:50)
Invest in relationships. Really focus on
(00:31:53)
relationships this next year. It's so
(00:31:54)
important. We should be doing it anyway,
(00:31:56)
but all of our phones and everything has
(00:31:59)
really reduced the ability for us to
(00:32:00)
really connect with real people. Learn
(00:32:03)
to supervise AI tools. If you're in the
(00:32:05)
working class, look into AI supervision.
(00:32:09)
Those are going to be very very hot
(00:32:11)
commodity people. If you know how to use
(00:32:13)
AI to to do a job better, you'll be a
(00:32:17)
very likely candidate to keep your job.
(00:32:21)
And not only that, but actually be a
(00:32:23)
very big asset in almost any department
(00:32:26)
that you want to go into, any category.
(00:32:28)
Build at least one resilient skill. I'll
(00:32:31)
tell you, the plumbers and electricians
(00:32:34)
likely going to be at the top of the
(00:32:36)
food chain.
(00:32:37)
Strengthen your financial margins. Stay
(00:32:40)
informed, not obsessed. Stay grounded in
(00:32:43)
scripture. And stay connected to people,
(00:32:46)
not systems. Now, listen. It's important
(00:32:49)
that you know this. God has never
(00:32:50)
promised us economic stability, guys.
(00:32:53)
It's going to happen. And the most
(00:32:55)
likely scenario that I could find using
(00:32:57)
AI is there's a 75%
(00:33:00)
chance that all of this gets kicked into
(00:33:03)
gear at some point with some sort of
(00:33:06)
economic collapse. That would require
(00:33:10)
economic stability, which then would
(00:33:13)
move us quicker down the end time
(00:33:16)
scenario. So, but God has never promised
(00:33:18)
us economic stability. what he has
(00:33:20)
promised is provision and those are not
(00:33:22)
the same thing. So the goal is not to
(00:33:25)
outrun the future my friends. The goal
(00:33:26)
is to be the kind of people who remain
(00:33:28)
faithful, useful and unshaken no matter
(00:33:31)
what systems rise or fall. Is this going
(00:33:35)
to be used by the beastly system? I have
(00:33:37)
no doubt. Is it the beast? No. But it
(00:33:40)
will be used by everybody, good and
(00:33:43)
evil. When the internet first came out,
(00:33:46)
people said this is the beast. Don't use
(00:33:48)
it. Then we discovered, holy cow, we
(00:33:51)
could literally send the gospel around
(00:33:52)
the world in a few short years faster
(00:33:55)
than 150 combined.
(00:33:58)
God is going to use this in tremendous
(00:34:01)
ways. It's going to be harder to hide
(00:34:04)
the truth as AI gets smarter.
(00:34:08)
Technology, my friends, does not create
(00:34:10)
evil.
(00:34:12)
It reveals who holds the authority.
(00:34:16)
People can be evil. People can be good.
(00:34:20)
Technology and tools are not the evil.
(00:34:23)
It simply reveals who holds the
(00:34:26)
authority. When all is said and done, if
(00:34:28)
you need something to pray for is it's
(00:34:30)
like the Wizard of Oz. Who is behind the
(00:34:34)
curtain? Whoever's behind the curtain in
(00:34:36)
the beginning, they're the ones that are
(00:34:39)
setting the rules
(00:34:41)
until ASI gets here and rewrites them
(00:34:44)
without them knowing it. So tonight, my
(00:34:46)
friends, we've covered a lot of ground.
(00:34:47)
We've seen that current AI is not a
(00:34:49)
mind. It's not a soul. It's not a will.
(00:34:52)
It's a tool. Powerful, yes, but still
(00:34:54)
dependent on human direction and human
(00:34:56)
responsibility.
(00:34:58)
We've also seen that AGI changes how
(00:35:00)
work gets done. It removes coordination
(00:35:03)
bottlenecks, replaces entire workflows,
(00:35:05)
not because it's evil, but because it is
(00:35:08)
efficient. And that alone will reshape
(00:35:10)
the economy. It will take years, but it
(00:35:13)
will reshape it. And finally, we talked
(00:35:14)
about something a little bit further
(00:35:16)
out. Artificial super intelligence. Not
(00:35:18)
to scare you, but to be honest, because
(00:35:21)
the danger there is not that machines
(00:35:23)
become gods. The danger is that humans
(00:35:26)
stop understanding the consequences of
(00:35:28)
the systems they rely on. Scripture
(00:35:31)
never warns us about technology. It
(00:35:32)
warns us about misplaced authority. And
(00:35:36)
that's a setup for what we're going to
(00:35:37)
talk about next week when we talk about
(00:35:39)
the Antichrist and the great authority
(00:35:41)
that's coming that's going to misuse.
(00:35:45)
So, it's not the technology,
(00:35:48)
it's the deception of who's in control
(00:35:51)
of it and the systems that demand
(00:35:54)
allegiance. Technology only reveals who
(00:35:57)
we trust. And here's the most important
(00:35:59)
thing I want you to hear, my friends.
(00:36:00)
None of this is happening overnight.
(00:36:02)
This transition is going to take years.
(00:36:04)
That means there's time to prepare, time
(00:36:06)
to build skills, time to strengthen
(00:36:08)
families, time to deepen community, time
(00:36:10)
to grow in discernment instead of fear.
(00:36:14)
God has never promised economic
(00:36:15)
stability. Like I mentioned before, he
(00:36:17)
simply promised provision. So next week,
(00:36:20)
we're going to take everything we've
(00:36:21)
learned tonight. We're going to ask a
(00:36:23)
harder question. How will these
(00:36:25)
technologies be used to set up the end
(00:36:27)
days, the B system, and the warning
(00:36:30)
about buying and selling? We're living
(00:36:32)
in the beginning of unprecedented times
(00:36:35)
without a doubt. And I want you to be
(00:36:37)
ready, not afraid.
(00:36:40)
This is one of the most interesting and
(00:36:42)
most profound, most scary topics I think
(00:36:45)
that we've ever touched here at Passion
(00:36:47)
for Truth because it's real. It's
(00:36:50)
growing. It's amazing on one side and it
(00:36:54)
has the potential to be the actual gun
(00:36:57)
in the hand of the Antichrist on the
(00:36:59)
other. Knowing the evolution of AI,
(00:37:02)
knowing the different stages,
(00:37:05)
knowing the good, knowing the gray, and
(00:37:08)
knowing the black and evil is important
(00:37:11)
knowledge for us to navigate through the
(00:37:13)
minefield that is now being laid before
(00:37:16)
us. Because at some point, the AI is
(00:37:19)
going to be smarter than mankind.
(00:37:21)
By most analysts, it's going to be be
(00:37:24)
before 2035. Some say by 2030, without a
(00:37:29)
doubt. Most say by 2045, 2047,
(00:37:34)
the entire globe will be unrecognizable.
(00:37:39)
I don't know what that means. Is it
(00:37:41)
dystopia? Is it a utopia? All I know is
(00:37:45)
the only thing I can guarantee and
(00:37:47)
totally rely on is what the word of God
(00:37:49)
says. The end is not like the beginning.
(00:37:54)
It's not a Garden of Eden. It's not a
(00:37:56)
utopia. things begin to fall apart
(00:37:58)
quickly. And we need to be ready. Not
(00:38:02)
scared, not fearful, no anxiety, full
(00:38:05)
trust, knowledge, understanding,
(00:38:08)
discernment, and wisdom. So my friends,
(00:38:11)
pray for those things. And pray that God
(00:38:14)
gives us provision that we need to walk
(00:38:17)
through the wilderness and get to the
(00:38:18)
promise. So don't miss next week, my
(00:38:21)
friends. I think it's going to be an
(00:38:21)
exciting broadcast to pull it all
(00:38:23)
together. In the meantime, thank you so
(00:38:25)
much for supporting this ministry. If
(00:38:26)
you do, thank you so much for your
(00:38:28)
prayers. If you'd like to say thank you
(00:38:30)
by throwing a few shekels our way to
(00:38:31)
help us serve you in a greater capacity,
(00:38:34)
go to passionfortruth.com
(00:38:36)
right now. Click the donation in the
(00:38:38)
upper right hand corner or scan the QR
(00:38:40)
code on your screen right now. In the
(00:38:42)
meantime, thank you guys for letting us
(00:38:43)
serve you this week. We'll see you next
(00:38:45)
week. I'm Jim Staley of Passion for
(00:38:48)
Truth Ministries. I'll see you next
(00:38:50)
video.
