↔
Title: The Inevitable Collapse of the Economy | Jeff Booth
Duration: 00:52:22
Total Correct Answers:
Current Caption
Correct
Learning Modes
YouTube Video Transcript Hide
Ask AI:
Export as:
Ask AI Result
The ask AI result will appear here..
(00:00:00) Your YouTube transcript will appear here
(00:00:00)
I saw an interview with Elon Musk
(00:00:02)
recently where he talked about with AI
(00:00:04)
and super intelligence that we may get
(00:00:06)
to a point where we don't need money at
(00:00:09)
all and money doesn't play a role in our
(00:00:12)
world. The natural state of the free
(00:00:14)
market is deflation. He must see the
(00:00:16)
productivity gains around which those
(00:00:19)
exponential productivity gains would
(00:00:21)
lead to exponential deflation, right? If
(00:00:24)
you had money that wasn't cheated. But
(00:00:27)
because money is cheated, we live in
(00:00:29)
that debt based system that has to
(00:00:31)
essentially stop that productivity
(00:00:33)
flowing to 8 billion people on the
(00:00:34)
planet and concentrate that wealth into
(00:00:38)
very few hands. An AI today is the
(00:00:41)
slowest by far it will ever be. If you
(00:00:44)
have a vote in a democracy, you're a
(00:00:45)
liberal democracy,
(00:00:48)
but you don't have a vote in your money
(00:00:49)
that's stolen from you and it's it's way
(00:00:53)
more than the taxes,
(00:00:55)
then do you does your vote matter at
(00:00:57)
all?
(00:01:03)
>> Jeff, hi. How are you?
(00:01:05)
>> I'm great. Yourself? Welcome to London.
(00:01:07)
>> Thank you. Um, I saw an interview with
(00:01:09)
Elon Musk recently where he talked about
(00:01:11)
with AI and super intelligence that we
(00:01:14)
may get to a point where we don't need
(00:01:16)
money at all and money doesn't play a
(00:01:19)
role in our world. I'm trying to
(00:01:22)
understand the bridge between
(00:01:24)
now and there. If we're going to have
(00:01:27)
incredible level levels of productivity,
(00:01:30)
how is everything still going to be more
(00:01:32)
expensive?
(00:01:34)
Um, good question. actually really good
(00:01:36)
question because I think that's the
(00:01:38)
thing that I can't I haven't seen
(00:01:40)
somebody in the existing system
(00:01:42)
including Elon Musk talk about this in a
(00:01:44)
in a cohesive way. Um and and he must
(00:01:49)
know that the natural state of the free
(00:01:51)
market is deflation. He must see the
(00:01:53)
productivity gains around which those
(00:01:55)
exponential productivity gains would
(00:01:58)
lead to exponential deflation. Right? If
(00:02:01)
you had money that wasn't cheated. But
(00:02:04)
because money is cheated
(00:02:06)
and or I'll set a different way because
(00:02:09)
we live in a debt-based system that you
(00:02:12)
in a debt based system that lends money
(00:02:13)
into existence with no cost of money. It
(00:02:18)
has to create more and more money
(00:02:19)
forever. So your our perception of what
(00:02:22)
money is is broken because we live in
(00:02:25)
that debt based system that has to
(00:02:27)
essentially stop that productivity
(00:02:29)
flowing to 8 billion people on the
(00:02:31)
planet and concentrate that wealth into
(00:02:34)
very few hands and Elon is one of those
(00:02:36)
very few hands. Well, some some people
(00:02:39)
listening to my new version of my show
(00:02:41)
might not have read your book and I
(00:02:42)
encourage people read Jeff's book. It's
(00:02:44)
incredible.
(00:02:45)
It's probably a good good starting point
(00:02:48)
to explain to them about this def the
(00:02:51)
nature of money and why technology is
(00:02:53)
deflationary and the debt based system
(00:02:55)
breaks what should be a life where we uh
(00:02:58)
work less and everything's cheaper
(00:03:00)
faster and better.
(00:03:01)
>> Yeah. And this is going to for if it's
(00:03:02)
the first time you're hearing this, it's
(00:03:04)
going to like you Peter.
(00:03:06)
>> Yeah. It's going to it it's going to
(00:03:09)
challenge every mental model you've ever
(00:03:11)
had because we can say if the natural
(00:03:14)
state of the free market is deflation,
(00:03:17)
right? And that is true because
(00:03:19)
entrepreneurs have to create more value
(00:03:21)
than what was there before and we only
(00:03:24)
use the things that are more valuable.
(00:03:25)
So they fail in the market if they don't
(00:03:28)
create more value. So the free market is
(00:03:30)
a perfect
(00:03:32)
system whereby it it's an infinite game.
(00:03:35)
Everybody wins. entrepreneur wins a
(00:03:37)
little bit, you win and the prices fall
(00:03:39)
as a result. Now, in that world, prices
(00:03:44)
fall to the marginal cost of production.
(00:03:46)
Economics 101, prices fall to the
(00:03:47)
marginal cost of production. So, so
(00:03:49)
lines of code like your calculator app
(00:03:52)
fall to zero because entrepreneurs
(00:03:54)
compete more and more. You still gain
(00:03:57)
value of your calculator app, right? But
(00:03:59)
it's free. Now you have to ask what is a
(00:04:02)
line of code creating other lines of
(00:04:03)
code which is where AI is go going right
(00:04:07)
that's free too and it provides and and
(00:04:09)
that's why you can see this exponential
(00:04:11)
explosion of productivity driving things
(00:04:14)
to free
(00:04:17)
um conflicting with a debt based system
(00:04:19)
that we've always lived in where
(00:04:21)
essentially since the 1600s where where
(00:04:23)
money was lent into existence a central
(00:04:26)
bank lends money into existence with an
(00:04:29)
interest rate that that system must
(00:04:32)
expand money forever. And what can you
(00:04:36)
say quite simply from that from what I
(00:04:38)
just said and this is what I explored in
(00:04:40)
in the book the race of tomorrow these
(00:04:42)
two systems would clash into each other
(00:04:46)
we would believe in the system that
(00:04:48)
we've always lived in and we would give
(00:04:51)
it more strength through our actions and
(00:04:53)
that would divide the world right
(00:04:54)
effectively that's the and and you
(00:04:57)
weren't going to slow down technology
(00:04:58)
right technology was because technology
(00:05:00)
is is when you say just technology it's
(00:05:03)
the things out of our brain s that we
(00:05:06)
try to solve to create more value.
(00:05:08)
That's what the free market is. And it's
(00:05:10)
exponential in in nature. And the other
(00:05:13)
thing I explored in my book um is if you
(00:05:16)
folded a piece of paper once, twice,
(00:05:19)
three times, four times, you can only
(00:05:21)
fold it seven times. But if if you could
(00:05:23)
imagine if you could fold it 50 times,
(00:05:26)
that piece of paper would reach from
(00:05:28)
here to the sun. You know, you know
(00:05:30)
that. And it still blows your brain. It
(00:05:32)
still blows my brain.
(00:05:32)
>> Yeah. It still blows your brain.
(00:05:33)
>> I still want to do it. Yeah, I know. You
(00:05:35)
can only fold at seven.
(00:05:36)
>> But but the pro and why I use that as an
(00:05:39)
analogy is everyone I talk to guesses 2
(00:05:42)
in and I get guessed 2 in the first time
(00:05:45)
I thought about that what it would look
(00:05:47)
like. But an exponential pattern is
(00:05:48)
something we can't grasp. So if we have
(00:05:51)
an exponential pattern driving the free
(00:05:53)
market and productivity and deflation
(00:05:56)
that should be speeding abundance to all
(00:06:00)
of us.
(00:06:01)
Um, and we can't understand an
(00:06:03)
exponential pattern. It means it means
(00:06:05)
we're in the thick folds today, right?
(00:06:08)
Fold 36 moving to fold fold 37. Yi seems
(00:06:12)
like nothing for a long time and then it
(00:06:15)
seems like everything. We're in the
(00:06:17)
we're in the steep steps of that paper
(00:06:19)
folding. And an AI today is the slowest
(00:06:24)
by far it will ever be. And that means
(00:06:27)
that productivity driven from it should
(00:06:30)
serve you. But in a debt based system,
(00:06:33)
it can't in a debt pay system. And there
(00:06:36)
is nobody in that debt pay system that
(00:06:38)
can solve that riddle. Right? There's no
(00:06:41)
politician. There's no there's no single
(00:06:43)
there's no person. It's a system problem
(00:06:46)
and we are the system. So um that's what
(00:06:50)
I that that's what I explored in the
(00:06:52)
book and and so you could read the book
(00:06:54)
today and you could it was written seven
(00:06:55)
years ago. You could see
(00:06:58)
it's like you had a you it's like you
(00:07:00)
had a time machine because you could see
(00:07:02)
the future. And it was a very very
(00:07:04)
simple
(00:07:06)
premise about a structural change that
(00:07:09)
was driving into humanity that most
(00:07:11)
people would take aside in the old
(00:07:14)
system and blame somebody else within
(00:07:16)
the old system because they didn't want
(00:07:18)
to take responsibility themselves. So in
(00:07:20)
some ways is AI exposing
(00:07:24)
this conflict even more in that we seem
(00:07:27)
to be heading towards this kind of
(00:07:28)
singularity this uh you know when Elon
(00:07:31)
talks about robots being able to create
(00:07:34)
robots but with super intelligence we
(00:07:36)
get to a point where there won't be
(00:07:38)
enough work for the 8 billion people on
(00:07:40)
the planet yet we're still going to have
(00:07:41)
the debt to service. So this kind of
(00:07:43)
exponential growth of abundance versus
(00:07:45)
exponential growth of debt and there's
(00:07:47)
going to be a clash
(00:07:48)
>> there. There all there has been there
(00:07:50)
has been for a long time. We're living
(00:07:52)
through that clash and people are
(00:07:54)
measuring that clash through the old
(00:07:56)
system is what's h what's happening. So
(00:07:58)
so the debt's been insolvent for a long
(00:08:00)
time. The debt's been insolvent for
(00:08:03)
actually probably forever because if you
(00:08:05)
allowed the free market to work,
(00:08:07)
productivity flowing to the people,
(00:08:10)
the debt would have collapsed
(00:08:11)
immediately, right? Because because
(00:08:15)
deflation cannot be allowed in in a debt
(00:08:18)
pay system. So people conflate those two
(00:08:21)
things. Econ economists conflate those
(00:08:23)
two things. They say inflation
(00:08:25)
deflation's bad without saying from a
(00:08:29)
system.
(00:08:31)
Why would why would productivity flowing
(00:08:34)
to you naturally? So you had to work
(00:08:36)
less and gain more forever where you
(00:08:40)
where where you got more and more
(00:08:42)
forever and ever by the competition of 8
(00:08:44)
billion people on the planet in service
(00:08:46)
to you. How could that be bad? Right?
(00:08:50)
It's bad from a system that won't allow
(00:08:52)
that. is bad for debt. It's because the
(00:08:55)
debt blows up. And so these two things
(00:08:57)
are almost inverse images, right? One's
(00:09:00)
trying to drive pricing down and and a
(00:09:04)
lot of the things that used to be in GDP
(00:09:06)
like your calculator app like a whole
(00:09:10)
you still gain value from them. Now you
(00:09:13)
have to price other things higher to
(00:09:15)
make sure all prices go up from this
(00:09:17)
other system. You have to create
(00:09:19)
scarcity from a debt pay system. And to
(00:09:22)
to and and remember it's there is no
(00:09:25)
such thing as 2% inflation like the
(00:09:30)
system should be deflationary. The
(00:09:32)
system should be so today's deflation
(00:09:35)
rate if you measured productivity
(00:09:36)
without all of this nonsense is probably
(00:09:39)
between five and and 10%.
(00:09:43)
Meaning if you have inflation on top of
(00:09:45)
that that's how much is being stolen
(00:09:47)
from you. uh per year. Ask where does
(00:09:50)
that where does it where does that
(00:09:52)
stolen money go? It
(00:09:53)
>> goes to the assets.
(00:09:54)
>> Yeah. And not just to the assets. Why do
(00:09:56)
you think Epstein looks like Epstein?
(00:09:58)
Right. Why do you think the whole
(00:10:00)
political class everywhere is in and
(00:10:02)
every all the entire system
(00:10:06)
is still look looks like that. Where
(00:10:08)
does that money come from? That system
(00:10:11)
has to look like that because it's all
(00:10:13)
that money is stolen from you, right?
(00:10:16)
It's stolen from eight billion people on
(00:10:18)
the planet and transferred into a bunch
(00:10:20)
into a scop that has to look
(00:10:22)
increasingly like that. And when then
(00:10:25)
that in that scop you have to control
(00:10:27)
people to hold them in that scop.
(00:10:31)
>> I don't think we've got to that level
(00:10:33)
you and I in these conversations before
(00:10:35)
where now you're connecting the
(00:10:37)
something like Epstein to this
(00:10:39)
>> it so so we we haven't because I always
(00:10:42)
wanted to take the high road. Yeah.
(00:10:44)
>> Right. And and so I just I just
(00:10:47)
>> But they're not hiding it anymore.
(00:10:48)
>> Well, so so I'll bet you just about
(00:10:51)
everybody that's watching your show
(00:10:53)
right now, this will feel really hard to
(00:10:55)
understand even though it's the most
(00:10:57)
simple thing, right? Natural state of
(00:10:59)
the free market is deflation. If you
(00:11:01)
can't dis disprove that, right, if you
(00:11:04)
look into that and and go down to the
(00:11:06)
sand and you know that's true, it means
(00:11:08)
you've never lived in a free market, but
(00:11:11)
you believe you do. If is is it so is
(00:11:14)
this a problem of having digital money
(00:11:16)
controlled by government
(00:11:18)
>> digital any money
(00:11:19)
>> controlled free market for money would
(00:11:21)
this happen?
(00:11:23)
>> Um so no it would it'd be messy on the
(00:11:25)
way through but but but any so if you
(00:11:29)
look at gold right gold centralizes
(00:11:32)
um and then then governments change gold
(00:11:35)
so that the derivative instrument on top
(00:11:38)
can still uh can still allow inflation.
(00:11:41)
Right? So, so gold has always done this
(00:11:43)
same thing and then when it breaks
(00:11:46)
there's typically global conflict wars
(00:11:49)
go back to say we're never going to do
(00:11:51)
that again and start it again. Right?
(00:11:54)
You just have to start the most simple
(00:11:55)
thing in the world. If the natural state
(00:11:57)
of the free market is deflation and
(00:11:59)
spend some time with it, right? Really
(00:12:01)
spend some time with it. Then then you
(00:12:04)
have to realize you've never lived in
(00:12:05)
one and all of these other things come
(00:12:08)
into focus. they come into it has to
(00:12:10)
look like that. Not and you you there's
(00:12:13)
bad people,
(00:12:15)
>> but I try to go thinking if I'm if I'm
(00:12:19)
inside that fight thinking it's this
(00:12:21)
leader or this leader or this leader and
(00:12:23)
they're still on that same money,
(00:12:26)
how could I solve it? How could anyone
(00:12:29)
solve it? This show is brought to you by
(00:12:31)
my lead sponsor, Iron, the AI cloud for
(00:12:34)
the next big thing. Iron builds and
(00:12:36)
operates next generation data centers
(00:12:38)
and delivers cuttingedge GPU
(00:12:40)
infrastructure all powered by renewable
(00:12:42)
energy. Now if you need access to
(00:12:45)
scalable GPU clusters or are simply
(00:12:47)
curious about who is powering the future
(00:12:49)
of AI check out iron.com to learn more
(00:12:52)
which is ir.com.
(00:12:56)
I was listening to the All-In podcast
(00:12:57)
yesterday and they were talking about
(00:12:59)
some quite scary numbers. Social
(00:13:00)
Security uh running out by 2032,
(00:13:05)
the um the increase in the average
(00:13:08)
increase in the debt of 2.5 trillion a
(00:13:11)
year per year uh until 2030. Um and all
(00:13:17)
of them, all four of them are talking
(00:13:19)
about this is starting to break.
(00:13:21)
>> Yeah. But it felt like that for a long
(00:13:23)
time, Jeff. It it's
(00:13:26)
so if you look at and we'll get into
(00:13:28)
Bitcoin in a second, but if you look at
(00:13:30)
Bitcoin just bounded by energy as
(00:13:32)
decentralized secure protocol bounded by
(00:13:34)
energy, then you can see it's measuring
(00:13:38)
what I just described. As long as it
(00:13:40)
stays decentralized and secure, it's
(00:13:42)
measuring prices falling forever. Now
(00:13:44)
it'll be volatile but all of the people
(00:13:47)
arguing from the other side 2.5 trillion
(00:13:49)
8 trillion COVID response it's just
(00:13:52)
another there has to be more things more
(00:13:56)
fear coercion control to keep you more
(00:14:00)
more surveillance
(00:14:02)
to keep you in that system because it's
(00:14:04)
not natural the natural state of the
(00:14:06)
free market is deflation we serve each
(00:14:08)
other right with that though do you
(00:14:11)
think they do you think they always know
(00:14:13)
or do you I think their responses are
(00:14:15)
natural responses to them trying to make
(00:14:17)
balance the books as best they can.
(00:14:19)
>> So, so if you start again start with the
(00:14:22)
first principles of those two things, a
(00:14:24)
debt based system can't allow deflation.
(00:14:26)
Natural state of the free market is
(00:14:28)
deflation. They're they can never go
(00:14:31)
together. They're opposite systems. So
(00:14:34)
this that system can't balance the
(00:14:36)
books.
(00:14:36)
>> No, but they try and keep that system
(00:14:38)
going like as best they can.
(00:14:40)
>> In other words in other words, steal
(00:14:42)
more from you. Yes.
(00:14:45)
>> Hire more people, more things to steal
(00:14:48)
more from you.
(00:14:48)
>> Less less rights, higher taxes.
(00:14:52)
>> How do how do you how do you make that
(00:14:55)
palatable for a population? It's two
(00:14:57)
sides of that equation. You have to
(00:15:00)
create us versus them. This side has to
(00:15:02)
be right against the other side. One
(00:15:04)
side,
(00:15:06)
one side moves to socialism. um because
(00:15:09)
because that that side um is looking at
(00:15:14)
all of the people who don't have assets
(00:15:16)
and they want a piece of the pie. So
(00:15:18)
they vote for those people that will
(00:15:20)
promise them free money for nothing and
(00:15:22)
it expands. One uh one side moves to
(00:15:26)
fascism
(00:15:27)
to be able to to pretend they were in a
(00:15:31)
free market, right? But it's not a free
(00:15:33)
market. And so and that divides society
(00:15:36)
on both and it's always happened. It
(00:15:38)
just we re uh we replay the system when
(00:15:41)
we go to war and then we we start again.
(00:15:44)
>> But how much do you think it's organic
(00:15:46)
and how much do you think it's planned?
(00:15:48)
>> There is no they right that that's why I
(00:15:51)
start from a system system level it's a
(00:15:55)
now there are people will who will find
(00:15:57)
if you had a system based on theft
(00:16:00)
>> and we know that system is based on
(00:16:02)
theft. Yeah.
(00:16:03)
>> Right. Now, that's a hard harsh word
(00:16:05)
because most people don't know that. Um,
(00:16:08)
but if you had a system based on theft,
(00:16:10)
how could you resolve the conflicts in
(00:16:12)
the world from a system based on theft
(00:16:14)
that had to worse that had to
(00:16:16)
increasingly increase the amount of
(00:16:18)
theft because the natural state of the
(00:16:20)
free market is opposite. So, so it's
(00:16:23)
unre it's unfixable from a system for um
(00:16:28)
or you could say it a different way
(00:16:30)
where we are in with technology where we
(00:16:33)
are with how fast technology is moving a
(00:16:36)
debt based debt based monetary system
(00:16:38)
cannot work without concentrating all
(00:16:40)
power in very few people who tell you
(00:16:42)
what you get.
(00:16:44)
>> Okay. And who are those? I had Simon
(00:16:46)
Dixon in here and he he told me that the
(00:16:49)
asset managers run the world.
(00:16:50)
>> Yeah. And and I actually like Simon. I
(00:16:53)
really like Simon's stuff. And and so
(00:16:55)
but we look at it from different
(00:16:56)
different paths. I that fear of creating
(00:17:00)
another they
(00:17:03)
removes our own ability to do something
(00:17:05)
about it.
(00:17:06)
>> Okay.
(00:17:06)
>> Right. And and so and and that's what
(00:17:09)
that's what the system will will want
(00:17:12)
you to do. Um here here's a way to uh I
(00:17:16)
don't know. Let's let's go to your next
(00:17:18)
question instead of Bitcoin. Well, so I
(00:17:20)
mean is there an you talk about there's
(00:17:23)
an inevitability that this fiat system
(00:17:25)
will collapse?
(00:17:26)
>> It it it it's not natural.
(00:17:27)
>> It's not natural. But when Yeah. When
(00:17:31)
does it collapse? And how will we know
(00:17:32)
it? We know it's collapsing.
(00:17:35)
Is it always collapsing or is there is
(00:17:38)
is there a collapse? Is there a moment
(00:17:40)
you're like, "Okay, this is we're done."
(00:17:42)
>> So So again, it collapses when we stand
(00:17:45)
up and make it collapse. Typically when
(00:17:47)
we stand up and make a collapse is when
(00:17:49)
we lose trust in that system because it
(00:17:51)
extracts so much from us that we can't
(00:17:54)
and and and that's why it typically that
(00:17:56)
system reverts back to the same system
(00:17:59)
and because we go to war thinking that
(00:18:02)
there's a resolve
(00:18:04)
>> it resets
(00:18:04)
>> from resets and then um World War I,
(00:18:07)
World War II um same thing resets
(00:18:10)
through time and then and then we build
(00:18:12)
nice monuments to say we'll never people
(00:18:14)
again build instit institutions that end
(00:18:17)
up driving
(00:18:19)
essentially enshrining theft.
(00:18:22)
And all of those institutions are part
(00:18:24)
of the next thing that makes it
(00:18:26)
collapse. And when people start to see
(00:18:27)
it, they start to there there's probably
(00:18:32)
no one watching your show right now that
(00:18:34)
when if they just looked at that from
(00:18:35)
our first principles can't see it in
(00:18:37)
them. They're mad, they're anxious,
(00:18:40)
they're fearful. But but what ends up
(00:18:42)
happening is if if you put in it's not
(00:18:46)
you, it's this person, right? You can
(00:18:50)
get people to bite on anything because
(00:18:52)
you want to believe it's somebody else.
(00:18:54)
Just remember, would you would you allow
(00:18:56)
allow a monetary system based on debt,
(00:19:00)
which is this studio, all the
(00:19:03)
restaurants downstairs, the entire
(00:19:04)
world, every banking system. Would you
(00:19:07)
allow allow that from that system
(00:19:11)
to allow deflation? And you wouldn't,
(00:19:14)
right? So, so we'll finish this podcast,
(00:19:18)
you'll go spend money in that system and
(00:19:21)
think it's somebody else, right? And and
(00:19:24)
it's us inside that system that that
(00:19:29)
we have to opt out because there is no
(00:19:31)
resolve from that system. But but the
(00:19:34)
more we're in this, the more mad we'll
(00:19:36)
get. Right. The more the more I'm going
(00:19:39)
to solve it, right? Whole bunch of
(00:19:41)
people will Yeah, you're the guy and the
(00:19:43)
other person's the bad guy because
(00:19:44)
they'll want to believe it's not them.
(00:19:48)
H
(00:19:51)
So unless
(00:19:54)
we have
(00:19:56)
I mean at the moment the UK is not in
(00:19:58)
good shape.
(00:19:59)
>> Where in the world is in good shape?
(00:20:01)
>> Switzerland seems okay.
(00:20:04)
Uh, and certain individuals are doing
(00:20:06)
okay and certain companies are doing
(00:20:08)
okay. I'm doing okay, Jeff. Um,
(00:20:12)
>> but I've kind of opted out like you.
(00:20:13)
We're going to get into Bitcoin. Um,
(00:20:17)
but we see these constant fights. We
(00:20:19)
move from election to election. It's
(00:20:21)
existential crisis to existential
(00:20:22)
crisis. If the Dems win the next
(00:20:24)
election in the US, it's going to be an
(00:20:26)
existential crisis for America. If JD
(00:20:28)
Vance wins, it's going to existential
(00:20:30)
crisis here in the UK. I mean the Labour
(00:20:32)
party are they're going to go from
(00:20:33)
having a parliamentary majority they're
(00:20:35)
predicted to get four seats in the next
(00:20:37)
election. I mean that is unprecedented.
(00:20:40)
The Conservative party are predicted to
(00:20:43)
be the fourth biggest party. Uh reform
(00:20:47)
have been leading the polls. They didn't
(00:20:49)
exist a few years ago. Rert Low
(00:20:51)
announced yesterday that he's going to
(00:20:53)
well he launched his party. He's already
(00:20:55)
polling at 10%.
(00:20:58)
I think everyone knows something is
(00:20:59)
wrong.
(00:21:01)
They're looking for an answer, which is
(00:21:02)
why these new parties appear and grow
(00:21:04)
really quickly. But unless one of those
(00:21:07)
comes out and says, "This is the problem
(00:21:09)
and this is how we solve it," nothing
(00:21:12)
gets solved.
(00:21:13)
>> That's exactly. So, every single uh
(00:21:16)
voter should ask
(00:21:19)
it should ask their politicians, is the
(00:21:22)
natural state of the free market
(00:21:23)
deflation?
(00:21:24)
>> It's the only question to ask.
(00:21:25)
>> Only question. And if they can't answer
(00:21:28)
that and if they say or if they say yes,
(00:21:31)
then ask them how are you going to
(00:21:33)
resolve this, what are you going to do
(00:21:35)
to resolve this? Because if if if the
(00:21:38)
people watching your show look backwards
(00:21:40)
and backwards again and backwards again
(00:21:42)
as things have gotten worse and worse
(00:21:44)
and worse, their lives it's and and
(00:21:46)
they're they're leaning in and giving
(00:21:48)
more strength to the system that's
(00:21:50)
stealing their energy faster and faster.
(00:21:53)
they'll realize that this election too
(00:21:55)
won't make any difference. There has to
(00:21:57)
be always a bigger crisis from a system
(00:22:00)
based on theft to keep people in fear to
(00:22:03)
be keep people locked locked in. And I'm
(00:22:05)
not saying all of the party leaders or
(00:22:07)
all the people aren't there's not good
(00:22:10)
people but but the foundational thing is
(00:22:14)
a different question. The foundational
(00:22:15)
question is thing is that system cannot
(00:22:18)
be resolved. a debt based system. You
(00:22:20)
can't fix a system problem from the
(00:22:22)
system creating the problem.
(00:22:24)
>> No, none of the political parties are
(00:22:26)
having this conversation. They're having
(00:22:27)
conversations about debt.
(00:22:29)
>> Yeah.
(00:22:29)
>> Yeah. The RERT low put in a bill into
(00:22:31)
parliament to uh ban QE in the country.
(00:22:35)
They wanted to ban that.
(00:22:35)
>> So, so, so think what that would do.
(00:22:37)
Now, a lot of people will vote for that.
(00:22:39)
If you ban QE in the country, you will
(00:22:42)
go into deflationary depression.
(00:22:43)
>> Yes.
(00:22:44)
>> Every bank will fail. Every all
(00:22:47)
everything will fail. If you go into if
(00:22:49)
you um now on the other side
(00:22:52)
>> because it can't service the debt
(00:22:53)
>> because it can't service the debt. The
(00:22:54)
debts are the debt the debt was
(00:22:55)
insolvent from a again against the free
(00:22:58)
market. The debt's insolvent by the time
(00:23:00)
it's started. Now if you had exponential
(00:23:03)
productivity which means exponentially
(00:23:05)
pricing falling prices that debt gets
(00:23:08)
more and more expensive until it fails.
(00:23:11)
Right? So the debts, all of the money in
(00:23:14)
the world, all of the money in the
(00:23:15)
world, the makebelieve pieces of paper
(00:23:18)
that people are pricing in and saying,
(00:23:19)
"What? What more debt?"
(00:23:21)
It's all gone to money heaven already.
(00:23:24)
I'm stealing from uh from Larry Leopard
(00:23:26)
is is money heaven. But uh um it's
(00:23:29)
already gone to money heaven. Now, it's
(00:23:31)
only a perception that you allow it to
(00:23:33)
be debased more and more and more
(00:23:36)
without asking the question, if it was
(00:23:38)
debased more and more, wouldn't that
(00:23:40)
lead to greater surveillance? Wouldn't
(00:23:42)
that lead to greater centralization?
(00:23:43)
Wouldn't that and and why is nobody
(00:23:45)
talking about the most simple thing, the
(00:23:48)
most simple thing in the world? They're
(00:23:50)
all talking about this nonsense uh above
(00:23:53)
above the first principle.
(00:23:57)
>> Perhaps some don't know.
(00:23:59)
>> Most don't know. Yeah. Yeah. They don't
(00:24:00)
they just don't actually know. They
(00:24:02)
haven't read your book. They haven't
(00:24:04)
studied money. They just are responding
(00:24:07)
to the decision the the things that put
(00:24:09)
in front of them every day as a
(00:24:10)
politician or the decisions they've had
(00:24:12)
to make. They haven't actually. But if
(00:24:14)
you if you had that politician in front
(00:24:16)
of you and you had them answer that
(00:24:20)
question um is the natural state of the
(00:24:22)
market deflationary
(00:24:24)
and maybe they didn't know but you
(00:24:25)
explained to them they suddenly
(00:24:26)
understood it. What do they do next? typ
(00:24:29)
typically go back to so and that's why
(00:24:32)
so you know this how many times have we
(00:24:34)
talked about it and it and it it takes a
(00:24:37)
long time for it to click right
(00:24:39)
>> yeah I think I mean I think it's
(00:24:42)
I understood it the first time I read
(00:24:43)
your book which was six seven years ago
(00:24:46)
I think I think when it pretty much
(00:24:47)
first came out and as I said I went back
(00:24:49)
and I text you I went back and read it
(00:24:51)
again because it clicked in a different
(00:24:53)
way
(00:24:54)
>> y
(00:24:54)
>> I think it clicked when I became more of
(00:24:56)
a beneficiary from the
(00:24:59)
I I I I laughed and I laugh well you and
(00:25:02)
I traded some texts laughing because
(00:25:03)
because each time I've gone on your
(00:25:05)
podcast
(00:25:07)
you've said now I get it.
(00:25:09)
>> Yeah.
(00:25:10)
>> And and but again it's such a deep
(00:25:12)
concept. It's so the depth of it because
(00:25:15)
you have to realize you're essentially
(00:25:17)
you're letting go of a lie one finger at
(00:25:19)
a time, right? And you don't want to let
(00:25:21)
go of that lie because it served you
(00:25:24)
well from the other system. M
(00:25:25)
>> so we we we we want to okay yep that's
(00:25:29)
true but it can also coexist with this
(00:25:32)
other system and we just go straight
(00:25:34)
back to what we do all the all day long
(00:25:36)
we go straight back to the centralized
(00:25:38)
media centralized coercion centralized
(00:25:42)
everything else and from that system
(00:25:44)
we're we're measuring everything from
(00:25:46)
that system we don't know we're stuck in
(00:25:48)
that system and the the thing that's so
(00:25:51)
easy that the the free market is an
(00:25:54)
infinite game you it says one thing. You
(00:25:57)
must provide value to somebody else to
(00:26:00)
be able to get paid and the result of
(00:26:01)
your actions uh of of providing value or
(00:26:06)
in service of everyone because then
(00:26:07)
those other people compete with you to
(00:26:09)
provide more value
(00:26:10)
>> and prices fall faster and faster.
(00:26:12)
>> I I think the reason it clicked this
(00:26:14)
time, Jeff, and I'll probably tell you
(00:26:16)
it get in a couple years it's clicked
(00:26:17)
again, but I think it really clicked
(00:26:18)
this time is because I've got close to
(00:26:20)
politics. I've got close to the levers
(00:26:22)
of power to the point of considering do
(00:26:26)
I run as an MP and then I'm trying to
(00:26:28)
understand well if I do based on what I
(00:26:30)
know about money and economics my
(00:26:33)
limited understanding and like what what
(00:26:35)
are the things I could do to fix this
(00:26:38)
and all I've I've seen the the negative
(00:26:40)
side the inf the loss of our rights in
(00:26:43)
this country the infringement of our
(00:26:44)
rights it's I it's embarrassing we've
(00:26:46)
got this real authoritarian streak at
(00:26:48)
the moment
(00:26:49)
>> yeah I'm I'm watching all over the world
(00:26:52)
But it's here. It's it feels fast. Like
(00:26:54)
the things they want to change, get rid
(00:26:55)
of jury trials, digital ID,
(00:26:58)
infringements on our speech. So we've
(00:27:00)
got the all these infringements on our
(00:27:01)
rights. We've got this massive increase
(00:27:04)
in bureaucracy. But it's bureaucracy
(00:27:06)
which is creating new industries,
(00:27:08)
bureaucratic industries, HR, accounting,
(00:27:10)
legal.
(00:27:11)
>> We've got minimum wages going up. And
(00:27:13)
the problem with the minimum wages is
(00:27:15)
that it's creating wage compression now
(00:27:17)
in that the lowest amount of money you
(00:27:20)
can say if you collect trolley at a
(00:27:21)
supermarket is very close to a lower
(00:27:23)
middle class wage now. So I'm seeing
(00:27:25)
that and so I've been looking at all
(00:27:26)
this and saying how do you fix it? How
(00:27:27)
do you fix it? What are the things you
(00:27:29)
can do? And I often come back to oh it
(00:27:33)
can't be fixed.
(00:27:35)
>> So that's
(00:27:35)
>> or I can't fix it. So, so you can um and
(00:27:39)
and you you might be perfectly
(00:27:42)
positioned to if you wanted to take
(00:27:44)
leadership, but then be honest that now
(00:27:46)
would would people vote for you being
(00:27:48)
honest and it maybe not this cycle
(00:27:50)
because they're not ready for the
(00:27:51)
honesty.
(00:27:52)
>> Um that's what happened with Blly,
(00:27:54)
>> right? And they were ready for honesty,
(00:27:56)
right? And they were ready for a a bold
(00:27:59)
leader who would drive Bitcoin into
(00:28:02)
their country. And if you look at that
(00:28:03)
country, if I just went back again, the
(00:28:06)
difference to watch to watch the UK go
(00:28:09)
one way.
(00:28:10)
>> Yeah.
(00:28:10)
>> And to watch El Salvador go the other
(00:28:13)
way.
(00:28:13)
>> Um it's it's remarkable. I've been there
(00:28:16)
four times over the last four years. And
(00:28:18)
four years ago, you were there too. It
(00:28:20)
was a scary place.
(00:28:21)
>> Very scary place.
(00:28:22)
>> Now
(00:28:23)
>> it's safe.
(00:28:24)
>> Not just not just safe. this center of
(00:28:27)
San Salvador is like it looks like a
(00:28:29)
beautiful uh um European city and people
(00:28:33)
kids are out playing in in the streets
(00:28:36)
11:00 at night families are around it's
(00:28:39)
it's stunning it's absolutely stunning
(00:28:41)
and so but again what ends up happening
(00:28:44)
is he took a bold step because he
(00:28:47)
couldn't do anything from that other
(00:28:48)
system and he went really hard to try to
(00:28:52)
rip it all out. So, if somebody's
(00:28:55)
listening to this and you're mentioning
(00:28:57)
Bitcoin and we still live in a world
(00:28:59)
where the vast majority of the people
(00:29:00)
when you say to them about Bitcoin, they
(00:29:02)
still think it's some kind of scam, some
(00:29:04)
kind of, you know, online scam, some
(00:29:07)
internet currency, they don't
(00:29:08)
understand. They don't understand how
(00:29:09)
it's foundational to repairing the
(00:29:12)
problem of debt and inflation in our
(00:29:13)
country. What's the easiest way you
(00:29:15)
could explain that to somebody? Um
(00:29:19)
so so ask ask them to ask what is money
(00:29:23)
first right and all money is is an
(00:29:26)
abstract concept of our trade and so if
(00:29:30)
money to you if that abstract concept of
(00:29:33)
our trade between humans can be
(00:29:35)
manipulated then what would happen to
(00:29:38)
humans trade right everything coming
(00:29:41)
from that that trade would be
(00:29:43)
manipulated and we know for sure how we
(00:29:45)
define money pieces of paper that can in
(00:29:47)
be infinitely printed
(00:29:50)
um is manipulation. So what would you
(00:29:53)
expect if you saw technology which
(00:29:55)
should should provide abundance and you
(00:29:58)
saw infinitely more pieces of paper
(00:30:00)
which was manipulation of our time and
(00:30:03)
you were measuring from that you would
(00:30:05)
expect to see everything you see. So, so
(00:30:09)
I type I take think about kind of four
(00:30:12)
personas in understanding this and um
(00:30:16)
and and I know for me you know too cuz
(00:30:19)
you went through the same thing and you
(00:30:22)
go through this path and you also were
(00:30:24)
in the other system and you you move you
(00:30:27)
move systems and you see your life
(00:30:29)
getting better
(00:30:29)
>> exponentially better
(00:30:30)
>> exponentially better which should be all
(00:30:32)
humans on the planet.
(00:30:33)
>> Yeah. Right. So, so let's take four
(00:30:36)
different personas. And a persona like
(00:30:38)
is a almost a marketing word for a group
(00:30:41)
of people who act like this, right? And
(00:30:44)
so a persona,
(00:30:46)
you don't know that money is broken. Um,
(00:30:50)
and you're measuring through that money
(00:30:53)
to to you, Bitcoin just looks like
(00:30:56)
another scam, right? To uh that there's
(00:31:00)
no use case. What is this thing? I can
(00:31:03)
trust institutions. I can trust the
(00:31:05)
politicians. I can trust because you
(00:31:07)
have no idea that money is broken.
(00:31:10)
And and and by from that measure for you
(00:31:15)
what will come back, right? Your belief
(00:31:17)
will fe right back. You'll be watching
(00:31:19)
the same media believing that
(00:31:21)
something's not and you won't have no
(00:31:23)
idea. It'll be true for you. Um and your
(00:31:26)
life, if you had assets, those assets
(00:31:29)
will look like they're going up. If you
(00:31:31)
didn't have assets, it'll look like
(00:31:32)
you're losing faster and faster and
(00:31:34)
faster. Both both things, right? Even if
(00:31:37)
you had assets, you will not be able to
(00:31:40)
build walls high enough to fight what's
(00:31:43)
coming. Right? So on both both of those
(00:31:46)
people within that cohort
(00:31:48)
would believe that they were right and
(00:31:52)
they would see Bitcoin as a as just a
(00:31:55)
distraction. Take another cohort of
(00:31:58)
people or persona. they they see Bitcoin
(00:32:01)
as a um as a technology and and
(00:32:06)
technologies are typically win or take
(00:32:08)
most until a new technology replaces it.
(00:32:10)
And so from that viewpoint, you would be
(00:32:15)
easily look at crypto, blockchain,
(00:32:17)
everything else. And there'd always be
(00:32:19)
another better technology. And what you
(00:32:21)
would be doing from that standpoint is
(00:32:23)
you were try you were trying to get out
(00:32:26)
of this system. you knew something was
(00:32:28)
wrong and you wanted to get rich really
(00:32:30)
quickly with all of the uh with with all
(00:32:33)
the other you saw other people get rich,
(00:32:34)
you wanted to get rich really quickly,
(00:32:36)
too. So, you take more and more risk in
(00:32:38)
this. And what would the market serve
(00:32:41)
you? This market would serve you a whole
(00:32:43)
bunch of scams to be able to do that,
(00:32:46)
right? and they would be promoting more
(00:32:48)
and more scams
(00:32:49)
>> and and from that viewpoint um and and
(00:32:52)
then from the other viewpoint the the
(00:32:54)
person who didn't understand money they
(00:32:56)
would look at both of these and say the
(00:32:58)
whole thing's a scam right now you take
(00:33:00)
another cohort of people or another
(00:33:03)
persona it's an asset right it's the
(00:33:06)
best asset but money is still broken on
(00:33:09)
top of that asset
(00:33:12)
and if you're if it's just an asset to
(00:33:14)
you and money is still broken then then
(00:33:16)
that asset has to be centralized faster
(00:33:18)
and faster and faster and that would
(00:33:21)
lead to the new kings of the world with
(00:33:24)
the same model that we've always had.
(00:33:27)
Then there's a fourth group persona and
(00:33:30)
those those people who see it as a
(00:33:31)
protocol and one thing about protocols
(00:33:33)
is they're winner take all. They don't
(00:33:36)
come and and and so there is no second
(00:33:38)
internet and they come in layers and
(00:33:40)
they add more more and more
(00:33:42)
functionality and from that viewpoint
(00:33:45)
you would realize okay this this thing
(00:33:48)
this thing is new it's never existed
(00:33:50)
before and if you had a decent open
(00:33:53)
decentralized secure protocol bounded by
(00:33:55)
energy
(00:33:57)
and it stayed decentralized and secure
(00:33:59)
it wouldn't m all of the other noise
(00:34:02)
none of it would matter right because it
(00:34:05)
would be repricing the world over over a
(00:34:08)
long enough time frame. The only caveat
(00:34:10)
is it stayed decentralized and secure.
(00:34:12)
If you understood it was a protocol and
(00:34:14)
protocols come in layer layers, you
(00:34:17)
would move your time to the protocol and
(00:34:20)
you would help build the layers. You
(00:34:21)
would be constantly on the defense of
(00:34:24)
what other nonsense is being said over
(00:34:26)
here, right? To be uh that's going to
(00:34:30)
try to attack this because it destroys
(00:34:32)
the entire foundation of everything
(00:34:33)
we've ever knew. known and replace us
(00:34:36)
with something better. But you would
(00:34:38)
move your time and and for that person
(00:34:41)
too, they would see everything getting
(00:34:44)
easier. They would see the relationships
(00:34:47)
that people understood that too and they
(00:34:48)
would see thousands of people that also
(00:34:51)
were building on a protocol where it's
(00:34:52)
not just an asset where it's money where
(00:34:55)
and they would start transacting in it.
(00:34:57)
If you just take each of those four
(00:34:59)
personas,
(00:35:00)
each one would be true to every person,
(00:35:04)
right? If you tried to convince, if I
(00:35:06)
tried to convince somebody right now
(00:35:08)
that my version is true as a protocol
(00:35:10)
and their version is they still believe
(00:35:12)
in institutions and money, good luck,
(00:35:16)
right? But I can tell you that in my
(00:35:19)
world and what I'm seeing and the um how
(00:35:22)
fast this is exploding, how fast it's
(00:35:24)
becoming money around the world. Um how
(00:35:28)
it's and it's removing this power, how
(00:35:30)
much risk it faces too because this
(00:35:32)
power wants to stop it. But you can
(00:35:35)
actually just move your time. It's it's
(00:35:37)
funny that point on time as well because
(00:35:41)
I think it's easy to look at Bitcoin
(00:35:42)
from the outside and think, "Oh, that's
(00:35:44)
you you got in early, you got lucky.
(00:35:46)
It's they they they value it based on on
(00:35:49)
the money itself, but what they miss is
(00:35:51)
the time and how it allows you to make
(00:35:53)
better decisions with how you use your
(00:35:55)
time.
(00:35:56)
>> It's it
(00:35:59)
free market is deflation.
(00:36:00)
>> Yes.
(00:36:02)
>> Um we have exponential productivity
(00:36:04)
gains.
(00:36:05)
>> Yes. Meaning a system that can't be
(00:36:08)
cheated will drive those exponential
(00:36:10)
productivity gains to you and everybody
(00:36:12)
in that network then and forever forever
(00:36:17)
as long as it stays decentralized and
(00:36:18)
secure and you have so people are inside
(00:36:22)
the jail cell right yelling at their
(00:36:24)
captors giving more strength giving more
(00:36:27)
of their energy that's stolen from them
(00:36:29)
for the same people
(00:36:31)
>> and they can just move. So those
(00:36:32)
exponential gains are being transferred
(00:36:34)
to those who are
(00:36:36)
>> part of a network on Bitcoin.
(00:36:37)
>> Part of a network on Bitcoin
(00:36:38)
>> and those and those people are not just
(00:36:40)
holding it. Those people are spending
(00:36:42)
it. They're driving circular economies
(00:36:45)
that this is what's happening in El
(00:36:46)
Salvador. This is what's happening in
(00:36:48)
many regions around the world that you
(00:36:50)
visited. I visited. It's early still.
(00:36:52)
It's so early still. Um, if if most of
(00:36:56)
the people on on your podcast haven't
(00:36:59)
heard this and they think they know
(00:37:02)
about what money looks like and they've
(00:37:04)
never asked themselves, what is money?
(00:37:06)
Imagine how early we are. I want to talk
(00:37:10)
to you about one of my sponsors, Incogn.
(00:37:12)
And that means we're going to talk about
(00:37:14)
the weird world of spam. And I don't
(00:37:16)
just mean those spam emails that you get
(00:37:18)
day after day from companies you never
(00:37:20)
heard of and companies you've never
(00:37:22)
signed up to. I'm also talking about
(00:37:24)
those spam phone calls you get from
(00:37:25)
those people who seem to know a little
(00:37:27)
bit too much about you trying to get
(00:37:28)
your bank details. It's all a bit
(00:37:30)
creepy. Right now, this all comes from
(00:37:33)
the world of data brokerage. There are
(00:37:35)
companies out there collecting your
(00:37:37)
data, building profiles, and sending
(00:37:39)
that data to anyone who wants it. Which
(00:37:41)
is why when one of those scammers phones
(00:37:43)
you up, they seem to know everything
(00:37:45)
about you. Now, I've tried I've tried
(00:37:47)
myself to get off these lists. Try to
(00:37:49)
get off the phone list. Try to get off
(00:37:51)
the email list. I unsubscribe from every
(00:37:53)
one of these emails that comes in. But
(00:37:54)
this game of whack-a-ole, it just never
(00:37:56)
ends. And so this is where Incogn comes
(00:37:59)
in. They do all the hard work for you.
(00:38:01)
They reach out to these companies and
(00:38:03)
they will get you legally removed from
(00:38:05)
these lists. And I know because last
(00:38:06)
time they sponsored my show, I signed up
(00:38:08)
and I didn't take the free option that
(00:38:10)
they offered me. Wanted to pay for it. I
(00:38:12)
wanted to see if you get value for
(00:38:14)
money. And they removed me from 79 data
(00:38:17)
broker lists. And so I've stayed on.
(00:38:19)
I've stayed a subscriber. and I have
(00:38:20)
seen a massive decrease in the number of
(00:38:23)
emails and phone calls I've been
(00:38:24)
getting. So, it's a great service. I
(00:38:26)
recommend you check it out. If you're
(00:38:27)
sick of this like I was, please head
(00:38:29)
over to incogn.com/peter
(00:38:32)
and sign up. If you use the code peter,
(00:38:34)
you will get a lovely 60% discount. So,
(00:38:36)
that's incogn.com/peter.
(00:38:56)
And with the exponential gains we're
(00:38:58)
going to be getting from
(00:39:00)
AI which is coming now. I mean I've seen
(00:39:02)
I mean you must have seen everything
(00:39:03)
that's happened with the SAS companies
(00:39:05)
over the last few weeks. It almost feels
(00:39:07)
like the last couple of weeks we've seen
(00:39:08)
some kind of acceleration. So do do you
(00:39:12)
know that even so if people went to my
(00:39:14)
Twitter I haven't been on Twitter for
(00:39:16)
>> I know what you do with your Twitter.
(00:39:17)
>> Yeah. You saw what I did.
(00:39:19)
>> Yeah.
(00:39:19)
>> Yeah. Okay.
(00:39:19)
>> Jeff B.
(00:39:20)
>> Yeah. Exactly. So I I trained an AI
(00:39:22)
agent that on all my content took me
(00:39:25)
less than a day on all my content. A
(00:39:27)
thousand thousand podcasts, my book,
(00:39:30)
whole bunch of content that I I wrote
(00:39:32)
and I trade an agent and just that agent
(00:39:35)
is on Twitter. But if for people who
(00:39:38)
want to say see what that looks like,
(00:39:40)
read the post on why I did it because I
(00:39:45)
don't think people realize that their
(00:39:46)
time is inside these systems. Um, and
(00:39:49)
they're fighting and yelling with just
(00:39:52)
bots, Russian troll farms, this farm,
(00:39:55)
this farm. And each person sees
(00:39:57)
themselves through this thing and
(00:39:58)
they're fighting more and more within
(00:39:59)
this system that's extracting their time
(00:40:01)
and energy. And so I I did it as a as
(00:40:05)
and I wrote why and I wrote why on my my
(00:40:08)
uh my website and and I'm on Noster on
(00:40:12)
some a social network built on top of
(00:40:14)
Bitcoin that I'm just spending time with
(00:40:17)
people I love doing the things I love.
(00:40:19)
Well, people are arguing with my bot,
(00:40:22)
right? And it's trending most days,
(00:40:24)
right? It's
(00:40:26)
>> But it's funny because you you know I
(00:40:28)
own a bar.
(00:40:28)
>> Yeah.
(00:40:29)
>> I sold it.
(00:40:30)
>> Oh wow. And that the reason I sold it is
(00:40:32)
because
(00:40:34)
operating that bar I have to do it from
(00:40:37)
the old system. I cannot do it from the
(00:40:39)
new system. If enough people came and
(00:40:41)
spent Bitcoin in there, maybe I could.
(00:40:43)
And we we do have some Bitcoin. People
(00:40:45)
have but not enough,
(00:40:47)
>> right? And so in that system I am
(00:40:49)
fighting inflatory cost rises
(00:40:53)
uh raises in uh um minimum wage
(00:40:56)
>> regulations
(00:40:57)
>> regulation changes the cost of living
(00:40:59)
crisis mean people are going out it's
(00:41:01)
I'm I'm trying to push water uphill to
(00:41:03)
keep that thing going
(00:41:04)
>> and in doing that it's taking my time
(00:41:07)
and I'm not increasing any there's no
(00:41:10)
like gains in prosperity or wealth for
(00:41:11)
me and I and I you know about 3 4 months
(00:41:16)
ago I went why am not doing this.
(00:41:18)
>> Yeah. And so you're a rational actor and
(00:41:20)
so what think think about this from a a
(00:41:23)
rational actor in in the free market
(00:41:25)
will do the best things to provide value
(00:41:27)
but if they can't they fail or they
(00:41:29)
close up and they because they couldn't
(00:41:31)
provide enough value right and and so if
(00:41:33)
if government takes more and more and
(00:41:35)
more
(00:41:36)
>> Mhm. Then then what the businesses do is
(00:41:39)
they automate faster, right? Because if
(00:41:42)
they don't automate faster to make
(00:41:44)
prices uh come down come down, then us
(00:41:47)
as users won't use the service or the
(00:41:50)
bar or anything else. So now you have
(00:41:52)
this conflict that everything turns into
(00:41:54)
central government everything. and and
(00:41:57)
and that central government and and the
(00:41:59)
manipulation around regulation and and
(00:42:02)
who is who fa so so I I don't think most
(00:42:06)
people would know this on your show but
(00:42:09)
regulation favors a monopoly
(00:42:12)
right there can't be a monopoly in a
(00:42:14)
free market because the margin created
(00:42:17)
creates the opportunity for people to
(00:42:19)
attack the margin and create more value
(00:42:21)
so so monopolies want regulation
(00:42:24)
>> yes they pretend they don't But that's
(00:42:27)
why that's why it's one big club and
(00:42:28)
you're not in it.
(00:42:30)
>> What's his name? George. What's the
(00:42:32)
comedian who says that?
(00:42:33)
>> George Carlin.
(00:42:34)
>> George Carlin. Yes. One big club and
(00:42:36)
you're not in it.
(00:42:37)
>> But the Bitcoin club is a small club and
(00:42:39)
you can be in that.
(00:42:40)
>> You can be So you can be in one big
(00:42:42)
club, one ever growing club that's going
(00:42:44)
to move to 8 billion people on this
(00:42:45)
planet.
(00:42:46)
>> So So what is the So what is the
(00:42:49)
intrinsic link then for you between AI
(00:42:52)
and Bitcoin? Are they is this is this a
(00:42:55)
a marriage?
(00:42:56)
>> Well, so so
(00:42:59)
how I look at it is just AI is just an
(00:43:01)
extension of productivity that was
(00:43:04)
naturally like you go back to that paper
(00:43:06)
folding. AI has been on the exact same
(00:43:08)
trend for 75 years. It's just when the
(00:43:13)
first fold felt and everybody the
(00:43:15)
thought thought that if you fold that
(00:43:17)
piece of paper once it'll feel like
(00:43:18)
nothing. If you fold it twice it'll feel
(00:43:20)
like nothing. And so there's this
(00:43:22)
overhype and now we're in the bigger
(00:43:24)
folds. And so AI technology broadly,
(00:43:29)
our innovation comes from standing on
(00:43:32)
the shoulders of great people who went
(00:43:33)
before us and error correcting. And
(00:43:36)
we're now error correcting at a rate
(00:43:38)
that is so fast. And that's going to
(00:43:40)
lead to faster and faster an exponential
(00:43:44)
explosion of error correcting. And then
(00:43:46)
the AI are going to merge with robots.
(00:43:48)
And the robots are going to compete with
(00:43:50)
robots and that's going to provide
(00:43:52)
faster and faster faster and faster.
(00:43:54)
There's going to be things along the
(00:43:56)
way. You'll hear people say, "Don't
(00:43:58)
worry, we're going to tax the robots."
(00:44:01)
Right? You laugh, but wait till you hear
(00:44:04)
it because you're going to hear people
(00:44:05)
you're going to hear Elon Musk say,
(00:44:06)
"Don't worry, we're going to we're going
(00:44:07)
to give you universal high basic
(00:44:09)
income." Where does that come from? It
(00:44:12)
comes from the monopoly created by
(00:44:15)
money.
(00:44:16)
Where does a universal high basic income
(00:44:18)
come from? Because the natural state is
(00:44:20)
you don't need the money because prices
(00:44:22)
keep falling forever. But you have to
(00:44:24)
have something that can't be
(00:44:26)
manipulated. You have to have Bitcoin to
(00:44:28)
allow you to see that. But he's also
(00:44:30)
talked about the age of abundance where
(00:44:33)
he thinks money, we won't need money.
(00:44:35)
And I struggle with that concept because
(00:44:37)
money is a measuring stick. So at some
(00:44:40)
point down
(00:44:42)
100 years from now, I would say we will
(00:44:46)
still probably need something
(00:44:48)
energybacked, right? The Bitcoin that
(00:44:51)
resolves that too. But
(00:44:55)
um you sure won't need very much, right?
(00:44:59)
That abundance will flow to you, right?
(00:45:01)
But you the energy prices will follow
(00:45:03)
that trend. All prices will follow that
(00:45:05)
that trend. Actually, if you measure in
(00:45:06)
Bitcoin over any long enough time period
(00:45:08)
and you measure energy prices in
(00:45:10)
Bitcoin, if you measure house prices in
(00:45:12)
Bitcoin, if you measure anything in
(00:45:13)
Bitcoin, you'll see the trend perfectly
(00:45:15)
clear.
(00:45:17)
>> So, but is AI creating a an accelerated
(00:45:22)
um imperative to understand and adopt
(00:45:25)
Bitcoin?
(00:45:25)
>> Both sides. Yeah. Both both sides. It's
(00:45:28)
creating accelerated insolveny of the
(00:45:31)
debt and and more not just insolveny of
(00:45:34)
the debt, but an awareness that the debt
(00:45:37)
was insolvent a long time ago and now
(00:45:39)
it's just blatant lies.
(00:45:42)
>> Yeah.
(00:45:42)
>> Right. And and blatant control now it
(00:45:45)
needs surveillance. So why why it
(00:45:47)
doesn't feel like a democracy anymore?
(00:45:49)
And it did feel like a democracy. Ask
(00:45:51)
yourself this. It if you have a vote in
(00:45:55)
a democracy, you're a liberal democracy.
(00:45:58)
But you don't have a vote in your money
(00:46:00)
that's stolen from you and it's it's way
(00:46:03)
more than the taxes.
(00:46:05)
Then do you does your vote matter at
(00:46:07)
all? All your I keep the the reference I
(00:46:11)
keep pointing to is that all you're
(00:46:14)
voting for now is the pace of change and
(00:46:15)
who it's pointed at?
(00:46:16)
>> Well, you're who gets to who gets to sit
(00:46:19)
on top of the broken money.
(00:46:20)
>> Yeah,
(00:46:21)
>> that's what you're voting for. You're
(00:46:22)
not voting for change.
(00:46:24)
voting for your side gets more of the
(00:46:26)
broken money than the other side.
(00:46:27)
>> Yeah. And more a socialist view or a
(00:46:29)
more fascist view.
(00:46:31)
>> Um so
(00:46:34)
if people don't
(00:46:37)
spend the time and go and understand
(00:46:38)
Bitcoin and choose to join that system,
(00:46:40)
they're going to get increasingly
(00:46:43)
>> mad squeeze go to and it depends where
(00:46:46)
they are. If you're if you're at the top
(00:46:49)
of that system, you're going to gain
(00:46:52)
more and more control. You can see in
(00:46:54)
Elon Musk, some people celebrate him and
(00:46:56)
he's gaining more and more control out
(00:46:58)
of essentially the techn the technology
(00:47:02)
today own the means of production and
(00:47:05)
the means of production um are the
(00:47:07)
things you use. And so why I created
(00:47:09)
that AI pot and I've been off Twitter
(00:47:11)
for a long time because the means of
(00:47:12)
production is farming me inside a system
(00:47:17)
to to to essentially take my voice
(00:47:20)
thinking it matters.
(00:47:23)
That's the means of production in the
(00:47:24)
other system. So now you now you have a
(00:47:26)
banking system and a technocrat system
(00:47:30)
both vying for control
(00:47:32)
of 8 billion mines on planet going
(00:47:35)
through that system.
(00:47:37)
So, so if we had, I don't know, if we
(00:47:41)
had a potential leader for the UK right
(00:47:44)
now, somebody who could potentially
(00:47:47)
win an election and you wanted to course
(00:47:50)
correct them. So, I know you think you
(00:47:53)
need to operate in this whole system.
(00:47:56)
You don't. You need to understand this
(00:47:57)
like what what are the things they would
(00:47:59)
do? Is it kind of what Bouay's done or
(00:48:01)
is it Yeah.
(00:48:01)
>> Yeah. But so
(00:48:04)
you have to start with
(00:48:06)
by the way try to if you were in a
(00:48:10)
debate in a if you were running and you
(00:48:13)
were in a debate with a bunch of talking
(00:48:15)
heads
(00:48:17)
have them try to answer any of these
(00:48:19)
questions right and realize that a
(00:48:21)
system problem can't be resolved by the
(00:48:23)
system problem and you'll hear uh uh
(00:48:26)
there is no they'll they'll move the
(00:48:28)
needle they'll move it somewhere else
(00:48:30)
but how do you solve that problem from
(00:48:32)
that system. And and so but but if you
(00:48:36)
realize how true that is, then you
(00:48:39)
should stop giving it any time, right?
(00:48:41)
And if you wanted to if you wanted to
(00:48:43)
run, now that's the problem.
(00:48:46)
The general awareness of what we're
(00:48:49)
talking about is so shallow. And why is
(00:48:52)
it shallow? Because they're looking
(00:48:54)
through the media of the centralized
(00:48:57)
system trying to divide them.
(00:48:59)
So, so you don't they have no idea that
(00:49:03)
they're stuck in a system and they're
(00:49:05)
being manipulated in that system.
(00:49:08)
>> So, even what Malay is doing is
(00:49:10)
>> still same still same system.
(00:49:12)
>> Same system.
(00:49:13)
>> The only the only leader today who
(00:49:16)
stepped out of it is Belli.
(00:49:19)
>> That's fascinating.
(00:49:21)
And so
(00:49:23)
if somebody is listening and their minds
(00:49:25)
are being blown right now and they're
(00:49:27)
thinking, "Yeah, I don't want to be in
(00:49:28)
this system anymore. I my groceries are
(00:49:32)
going up. My wages aren't keeping up.
(00:49:33)
That I can't afford a holiday this year.
(00:49:36)
I'm increasingly stressed. I'm shouting
(00:49:38)
at the TV."
(00:49:41)
The only real advice is you have to step
(00:49:44)
out of the system.
(00:49:44)
>> And what I would say is learn first.
(00:49:47)
There's so many scams out there. where
(00:49:49)
there's so many charlatans and
(00:49:50)
everything else. So learn first learn
(00:49:52)
from people who have the proof of work
(00:49:54)
whe So Bitcoin people say proof of proof
(00:49:57)
of work and proof of work you can also
(00:50:00)
see in people have they been saying the
(00:50:01)
same thing for a long time what have
(00:50:04)
they done and what does it look like and
(00:50:06)
and so you could go look at your
(00:50:08)
podcasts four years ago. One of the
(00:50:10)
things that that makes you so easy to
(00:50:13)
follow is because you're honest with
(00:50:16)
your changes,
(00:50:17)
>> right? And people love that about you
(00:50:19)
and you're just honest and and and
(00:50:21)
watching that come through and and so
(00:50:23)
some people aren't right flavor of the
(00:50:26)
day today. They'll change a hundred
(00:50:28)
times just to get a new vote and
(00:50:31)
everything else. And so so in Bitcoin,
(00:50:33)
watch for people who have been there a
(00:50:35)
long time showing their proof of work
(00:50:37)
and and say and and have they been have
(00:50:41)
has their integrity been the same the
(00:50:42)
whole time?
(00:50:44)
>> And read your book, Price of Tomorrow.
(00:50:46)
definitely go and read Jeff's book. Um I
(00:50:49)
think some people are are going to be
(00:50:52)
terrified.
(00:50:54)
Uh I think some people are going to be
(00:50:55)
terrified by this, Jeff. Um it's a
(00:50:58)
frightening situation if things do start
(00:51:00)
to collapse because people have
(00:51:01)
mortgages, uh car payments. Um it's very
(00:51:05)
hard for some people to opt out of
(00:51:06)
society. I think that creates an
(00:51:08)
imperative for a political leader to
(00:51:11)
understand this and explain it to people
(00:51:13)
and make that decision for the
(00:51:15)
collective.
(00:51:17)
>> Yeah. Um and and maybe just just one one
(00:51:19)
of the things on Bitcoin because it was
(00:51:21)
it's an open decentralized secure
(00:51:23)
protocol founded by energy,
(00:51:25)
you don't have to wait for anybody. You
(00:51:28)
can just go. So, so a politician that
(00:51:32)
really wants to create legacy, really
(00:51:35)
wants to create value for their
(00:51:37)
citizens, if they want to take the hold
(00:51:39)
of that mantle and help their citizens
(00:51:41)
understand faster, I think it's a
(00:51:43)
incredibly powerful uh platform.
(00:51:46)
>> Yeah.
(00:51:46)
>> Um but but any single person, they don't
(00:51:50)
have to wait. This is one thing you
(00:51:51)
don't have to wait for. You could start
(00:51:53)
right now.
(00:51:54)
>> We've crammed a lot into 50 55 minutes.
(00:51:57)
uh a chance that you were in London I
(00:51:59)
couldn't miss up but uh we will follow
(00:52:01)
this up again. Listen people um go back
(00:52:04)
I've done four or five interviews with
(00:52:05)
Jeff maybe more and his book Price of
(00:52:07)
Tomorrow is amazing. Go and check it out
(00:52:09)
if you're terrified by this system. Go
(00:52:11)
and look at Bitcoin. Love you all. Thank
(00:52:12)
you Jeff. Thanks.
