↔
Title: S13 E02: Epstein Files & Twitter: 2/22/26: Last Week Tonight with John Oliver
Duration: 00:39:29
Total Correct Answers:
Current Caption
Correct
Learning Modes
YouTube Video Transcript Hide
Ask AI:
Export as:
Ask AI Result
The ask AI result will appear here..
(00:00:00) Your YouTube transcript will appear here
(00:00:29)
Welcome. Welcome, welcome, welcome to
(00:00:31)
last WEEK TONIGHT. I'M JALON. THANK YOU
(00:00:33)
SO MUCH FOR JOINING US. It has been a
(00:00:35)
busy week. The Supreme Court struck down
(00:00:38)
Trump's tariffs and he met with his
(00:00:40)
board of peace shortly before going back
(00:00:42)
to pushing the US toward war with Iran.
(00:00:44)
But we're actually going to start in the
(00:00:46)
UK this week where Thursday brought some
(00:00:48)
massive news. This morning, a stunning
(00:00:51)
royal arrest. Former Prince Andrew taken
(00:00:53)
into custody from his home in the
(00:00:55)
English countryside. It follows growing
(00:00:57)
revelations about the alleged
(00:00:58)
connections between the late sex
(00:01:00)
offender Jeffrey Epstein and Andrew.
(00:01:03)
>> It's true. They arrested former Prince
(00:01:04)
Andrew. And I don't know why they're
(00:01:06)
still going with alleged connections to
(00:01:08)
Epstein there while also running a photo
(00:01:10)
that makes them look like the two
(00:01:12)
closest friends I've ever seen. It looks
(00:01:14)
like they're brainstorming a new
(00:01:16)
podcast. It looks like Andrew soft
(00:01:18)
launching. Hey, would it be crazy if we
(00:01:20)
moved in together? I'm just saying.
(00:01:23)
Maybe drop the alleged part when you're
(00:01:24)
dealing with two guys that look so close
(00:01:26)
they could finish each other's prison
(00:01:27)
sentences. And if you're thinking, well,
(00:01:30)
what was the new revelation that did it?
(00:01:31)
Was the was it the grotesque new photo
(00:01:33)
of Andrew on all fours over a young
(00:01:35)
woman? Incredibly, no. It was apparently
(00:01:37)
this. The arrest reportedly linked to
(00:01:39)
emails released by the US Department of
(00:01:41)
Justice as part of the Epstein files
(00:01:43)
that show Andrew forwarding emails to
(00:01:46)
Epstein while he was trade envoy. The
(00:01:48)
emails, some dated in 2010, well after
(00:01:50)
Epstein had already been convicted of
(00:01:52)
soliciting sex from a minor, show Andrew
(00:01:55)
forwarding British government files from
(00:01:56)
his trips to places like Hong Kong and
(00:01:58)
Vietnam. Yeah, they got him on
(00:02:00)
forwarding documents, which is a little
(00:02:03)
underwhelming though, to be honest. When
(00:02:04)
it comes to bringing down monsters, I
(00:02:06)
don't really care if it's for a boring
(00:02:08)
computer crime. The same way I'm not
(00:02:10)
that mad if what finally ends a toddler
(00:02:12)
throwing a tantrum is a cardboard box.
(00:02:14)
The method doesn't matter. What's
(00:02:16)
important is you have been stopped. Now,
(00:02:20)
Andrew has repeatedly denied all
(00:02:22)
wrongdoing and has has been released,
(00:02:23)
although that does not mean he's been
(00:02:25)
found not guilty. All we really have to
(00:02:27)
go on right now is this fantastic
(00:02:29)
picture of him leaving custody. And you
(00:02:32)
can draw your own conclusions there.
(00:02:34)
Reasonable people can disagree on
(00:02:35)
whether this makes him look guilty or
(00:02:38)
dead. And I've got to say, even him
(00:02:41)
being taken into custody this week must
(00:02:43)
have been gratifying for some, including
(00:02:46)
anyone who's ever had to work for him.
(00:02:47)
Because to hear at least one former
(00:02:49)
officer who was assigned to guard
(00:02:50)
Andrew, he wasn't the greatest to be
(00:02:52)
around.
(00:02:53)
>> Did Prince Andrew have a nickname at
(00:02:56)
that time?
(00:02:56)
>> Well, his his his official code, so if
(00:02:59)
he was to come into the palace, he would
(00:03:00)
call someone was purple 41. But he did
(00:03:03)
have a nickname. But it's a bit rude for
(00:03:05)
me to tell you one I'll tell you. But
(00:03:08)
you're not going to be able to air it.
(00:03:10)
It was just called Do you want me to
(00:03:11)
tell you?
(00:03:12)
>> Yeah.
(00:03:13)
>> It was called the
(00:03:16)
Yeah.
(00:03:18)
Yeah. ACCORDING ACCORDING TO THAT GUY,
(00:03:21)
that was Andrew's unofficial nickname.
(00:03:23)
And it's a little weird he was so wary
(00:03:25)
of saying that word on TV given he was
(00:03:27)
appearing on Australia's 60 Minutes. And
(00:03:30)
Australians say all the time. I'm
(00:03:31)
pretty sure Blueie said it at least
(00:03:33)
three times. But it's not just codeame
(00:03:36)
here facing consequences. Take
(00:03:38)
Peter Mandlesson, the UK's former
(00:03:40)
ambassador to DC. He's also under police
(00:03:42)
investigation for forwarding government
(00:03:44)
emails to Epstein, something he's
(00:03:45)
denied. And there are also questions
(00:03:47)
about how close they were, especially
(00:03:49)
given the sheer number of photos of them
(00:03:51)
together, including this recently
(00:03:53)
released one of him in his underwear
(00:03:55)
seemingly in Epstein's apartment. And
(00:03:57)
the very fact Prime Minister Kiama
(00:03:59)
appointed Mandlesson ambassador in the
(00:04:00)
first place is now a major scandal. His
(00:04:03)
chief of staff and communications
(00:04:04)
director have resigned and it may not
(00:04:06)
stop there.
(00:04:07)
>> The followout is now directly
(00:04:09)
threatening the prime minister.
(00:04:11)
>> Prime Minister
(00:04:12)
>> Kier Starmer has admitted to parliament
(00:04:14)
he knew of Matt's past association with
(00:04:16)
Epstein, but that he had not been told
(00:04:18)
the truth about the extent of the
(00:04:20)
relationship. The admission has sparked
(00:04:22)
a furious backlash, including from
(00:04:24)
members of Starmer's own party who are
(00:04:27)
openly questioning his judgment and his
(00:04:29)
leadership.
(00:04:30)
>> Right? because that shows terrible
(00:04:33)
judgment. A crucial part of leadership
(00:04:35)
is who you pick to be on your team. If
(00:04:37)
the Raiders decided at this year's NFL
(00:04:40)
draft to use their number one pick to
(00:04:42)
select Roman Palansky,
(00:04:44)
everyone involved in that decision
(00:04:46)
should probably be fired. But here in
(00:04:48)
the US, there's been a notable lack of
(00:04:50)
consequences for several high-profile
(00:04:52)
figures who've appeared in the files.
(00:04:54)
Most notably, this guy is still
(00:04:56)
president. But also his commerce
(00:04:57)
secretary, Howard Lutnik, Epstein's
(00:04:59)
former nextoor neighbor, by the way, has
(00:05:02)
come under scrutiny because he
(00:05:03)
previously said he met Epstein only once
(00:05:05)
in 2005 and was so revolted he declared,
(00:05:07)
"I will never be in the room with that
(00:05:09)
disgusting person ever again." But new
(00:05:12)
documents reveal not only were they in
(00:05:14)
touch after that, Lutnik actually
(00:05:15)
visited Epstein's island, something he
(00:05:17)
tried to justify like this. I did have
(00:05:20)
lunch with him as I was on a boat going
(00:05:23)
across on a family vacation. My wife was
(00:05:26)
with me as were my four children and
(00:05:29)
nannies. We were on family vacation. We
(00:05:32)
were not apart to suggest there was
(00:05:34)
anything unoured about that in 2012.
(00:05:38)
I don't I don't recall why we did it.
(00:05:40)
But Mr.
(00:05:42)
>> Okay. To be clear, there was a lot
(00:05:44)
untored about meeting Epstein in 2012.
(00:05:47)
He'd left jail 3 years earlier as a sex
(00:05:49)
offender and it was widely known what
(00:05:51)
kind of guy he was at that time and it's
(00:05:53)
not a great look that it seems the end
(00:05:55)
of Lutnik's sentence I will never be in
(00:05:56)
a room with that disgusting person again
(00:05:58)
was apparently unless that is I can
(00:06:00)
bring my kids
(00:06:02)
but Lutnik is still in his job as by the
(00:06:05)
way is Peter Aier who CBS News had only
(00:06:08)
just hired as part of their new roster
(00:06:09)
of contributors when the files were
(00:06:11)
released and the details about him in
(00:06:13)
there aren't great
(00:06:15)
>> the celebrity longevity influence
(00:06:16)
influencer appears in the files more
(00:06:19)
than 1,700 times. In 2015, AIA wrote,
(00:06:22)
"The biggest problem with becoming
(00:06:23)
friends with you, the life you lead is
(00:06:25)
so outrageous and yet I cannot tell a
(00:06:28)
soul."
(00:06:29)
>> Oh, and that is not close to the worst
(00:06:31)
of it. Kazatilla also apparently wrote
(00:06:33)
to Epstein's assistant saying, "I go
(00:06:35)
into J withdrawal when I don't see him."
(00:06:38)
And wrote to Epstein directly saying
(00:06:40)
that, and I quote, "Pussy is indeed low
(00:06:42)
carb. still waiting results on gluten
(00:06:46)
content though. Now, AI has apologized
(00:06:48)
for those emails and has stepped down as
(00:06:50)
chief science officer of the protein bar
(00:06:52)
company David following these
(00:06:54)
revelations. But incredibly, as of
(00:06:56)
taping, CBS News still seems to be
(00:07:00)
keeping him on as a contributor. And it
(00:07:01)
is wild that CBS News somehow has lower
(00:07:06)
standards than A PROTEIN BAR COMPANY
(00:07:09)
THAT MARKETS THEIR PRODUCTS LIKE THIS
(00:07:11)
AND ALSO LIKE THIS. AND I'M NOT SURE who
(00:07:14)
at that company thought their bars
(00:07:16)
needed to be 80s horny, but I hope
(00:07:18)
they're gone, too. And look, I'm not
(00:07:20)
saying Ailla or Lutnik have committed
(00:07:22)
crimes, but it is clear just how
(00:07:25)
comfortable far too many people were
(00:07:27)
looking past Epstein's heinous actions.
(00:07:29)
And given the lack of accountability in
(00:07:31)
all this, there's at least some
(00:07:32)
satisfaction in knowing just how nervous
(00:07:35)
some powerful men must be feeling right
(00:07:37)
now. A nervousness that's kind of hard
(00:07:39)
to put into words. But luckily, I think
(00:07:41)
this picture sums it up pretty well. And
(00:07:45)
now this.
(00:07:47)
>> And now, people on TV celebrate National
(00:07:50)
Drink Wine Day.
(00:07:52)
>> Today is National Drink Wine Day.
(00:07:56)
>> It is recommended, friends, to drink in
(00:07:58)
moderation. So, one glass that's this
(00:08:02)
big.
(00:08:02)
>> It's Ash Wednesday. Um, I'm Catholic.
(00:08:05)
They serve wine at mass
(00:08:07)
>> because of Lent. Make sure you eat fish
(00:08:09)
today. So, EP Micah hooked me up. I
(00:08:12)
don't really know if this is a hookup,
(00:08:13)
guys, but he hooked me up with some fish
(00:08:15)
sticks and some generic wines.
(00:08:17)
>> It is Ash Wednesday. I think this is
(00:08:19)
interesting that it coincides with
(00:08:21)
National Drink Wine Day.
(00:08:23)
>> Kind of is, isn't it?
(00:08:24)
>> Is it?
(00:08:25)
>> Yeah.
(00:08:26)
>> This is nice rosé for the day.
(00:08:27)
>> How is it?
(00:08:28)
>> It's very good.
(00:08:29)
>> It's good.
(00:08:30)
>> National Wine Day. It is good. Tastes
(00:08:32)
different at 6:45 a.m.
(00:08:37)
>> Moving on, our main story tonight
(00:08:39)
concerns Twitter, or as it's been called
(00:08:40)
since Elon Musk purchased it a few years
(00:08:42)
ago, Twitter. It's a site with exactly
(00:08:46)
one good account left. Gerald Strapford,
(00:08:48)
a retired British man who delights
(00:08:50)
followers with his giant vegetables.
(00:08:52)
>> I've just cut this big cabbage.
(00:08:56)
It's a PB for me. I haven't got any
(00:08:59)
scales big enough to weigh it.
(00:09:02)
But, uh, I'm not worried about that.
(00:09:04)
It's a beautiful specimen.
(00:09:06)
>> Yeah, it is, Gerald. And I, for one, I'm
(00:09:08)
glad that you cut that cabbage. To be
(00:09:10)
honest, I haven't been this jazzed to
(00:09:11)
see a cabbage broken in half since my
(00:09:13)
wedding night. Twitter has clearly
(00:09:17)
changed significantly in recent years.
(00:09:19)
And you can pinpoint the moment that
(00:09:20)
started because it's the day in October
(00:09:22)
2022 when Elon tweeted a video of
(00:09:24)
himself carrying a sink into Twitter
(00:09:26)
headquarters, writing, "Let that sink
(00:09:29)
in." in a joke so funny I'm still
(00:09:31)
laughing right now.
(00:09:34)
And he quickly made it clear that the
(00:09:35)
company was going to be different. He
(00:09:36)
changed Twitter's name to X, announced
(00:09:38)
an extremely hardcore cultural reset,
(00:09:40)
and by his count said he cut about 80%
(00:09:42)
of Twitter's staff. And to hear Elon
(00:09:44)
tell it, he did this to protect free
(00:09:46)
speech and correct for what many
(00:09:48)
conservatives considered a left-wing
(00:09:49)
bias. In fact, as far as he was
(00:09:50)
concerned, nothing less than the fate of
(00:09:53)
the world was at stake. The reason for
(00:09:55)
acquiring Twitter is because um it was
(00:09:59)
it it was c it was causing destruction
(00:10:01)
at a civilizational level. You know,
(00:10:03)
like Worm Tongue from Lord of the Rings
(00:10:06)
uh where he would just sort of like
(00:10:08)
whisper these, you know, terrible things
(00:10:10)
to the king. So the king would believe
(00:10:12)
these things that weren't true. And they
(00:10:14)
were pushing uh a nihilistic
(00:10:17)
anti-vilizational mind virus to the
(00:10:19)
world. Okay, for the record, Twitter's
(00:10:23)
not a good analog for Worm Tongue at
(00:10:24)
all. And I'm guessing I don't need to
(00:10:26)
explain why, given the ven diagram
(00:10:27)
between viewers of this show and people
(00:10:30)
familiar with second tier Lord of the
(00:10:31)
Rings characters is, I'm pretty sure, a
(00:10:33)
single circle, as round, in fact, as the
(00:10:36)
outermost wall of Minis Tith.
(00:10:41)
But what Elon's embrace of so-called
(00:10:43)
free speech has actually resulted in is
(00:10:45)
much darker. One study found an
(00:10:47)
approximately 50% increase in posts
(00:10:49)
containing hate speech. And recently,
(00:10:51)
you may have heard about the platform's
(00:10:52)
struggles with Grock's image editing
(00:10:54)
tool, which has allowed users to create
(00:10:56)
digitally altered sexualized photos of
(00:10:58)
real people, including miners. And look,
(00:11:01)
no one is saying Twitter was perfect
(00:11:03)
before Elon arrived. It helped platform
(00:11:06)
a lot of ugliness, including but not
(00:11:08)
limited to our first poster
(00:11:10)
president. But it is genuinely worse
(00:11:13)
now. And you might think you already
(00:11:15)
know how bad it is or that it doesn't
(00:11:17)
matter to you because you're no longer
(00:11:18)
on it. But I promise it's actually worse
(00:11:20)
than you think for reasons you may not
(00:11:22)
know and in ways that will unfortunately
(00:11:24)
impact all of us. So given that tonight,
(00:11:27)
let's talk about Twitter. Let's start
(00:11:28)
with some of the most visible changes
(00:11:30)
Elon's made. One of his first involved
(00:11:32)
the site's verification system, which
(00:11:34)
used to assign a blue check mark to
(00:11:36)
anyone wellknown enough that they might
(00:11:38)
need an official sign that they were who
(00:11:40)
they said they were. Elon replaced that
(00:11:42)
with a system where anyone can get a
(00:11:44)
blue check if they simply became a
(00:11:45)
premium user who paid $8 a month. And
(00:11:48)
that led to instant, albeit very funny,
(00:11:50)
chaos.
(00:11:52)
>> All of a sudden, scrollers saw LeBron
(00:11:54)
James asking for a trade. Oil company
(00:11:58)
British Petroleum admitting it killed
(00:12:00)
the planet and drug manufacturer Eli Liy
(00:12:04)
offering insulin for free.
(00:12:07)
>> It's true. Fake accounts sprung up all
(00:12:10)
over the place. Fake George Bush said he
(00:12:12)
missed killing Iraqis. To which fake
(00:12:14)
Tony Blair said, "Same TBH."
(00:12:17)
Fake OJ Simpson said, "Not going to lie,
(00:12:19)
I did that shit." And a fake American
(00:12:22)
Girl doll account said, "Felicity owned
(00:12:24)
slaves." Continuing, "I'm not even
(00:12:26)
lying. Look it up." Now, Elon eventually
(00:12:30)
added new gray and gold check marks to
(00:12:32)
help verify some official accounts.
(00:12:34)
While I'm not sure exactly which fake
(00:12:36)
tweet made him do that, if I had to
(00:12:38)
guess, it'd be this one from a fake
(00:12:39)
Tesla account that said, "Our cars do
(00:12:41)
not respect school zone speed limits.
(00:12:43)
them kids." So already the site was
(00:12:47)
much less reliable because it was harder
(00:12:49)
to tell who was trustworthy. But on top
(00:12:51)
of that, Elon took an axe to the site's
(00:12:54)
ability to deal with harmful content by,
(00:12:56)
among other things, slashing its global
(00:12:58)
trust and safety staff, including
(00:13:00)
reducing its full-time content
(00:13:01)
moderators by over 50%. He also started
(00:13:04)
restoring a lot of accounts that had
(00:13:06)
been banned for violating the platform's
(00:13:07)
policies on things like abusive behavior
(00:13:09)
and inciting violence. He memorably
(00:13:11)
brought back this guy as well as Alex
(00:13:13)
Jones, Andrew Tate, Nick Fuentes, and UK
(00:13:16)
anti-immigrant crusader Tommy Robertson,
(00:13:18)
which I believe is known as a nightmare
(00:13:20)
anything rotation. And that was just the
(00:13:23)
beginning. Twitter accounts belonging to
(00:13:25)
far-right activists and QAnon theorists
(00:13:27)
have been reinstated. According to data
(00:13:30)
reviewed by NBC News, hundreds of
(00:13:32)
formerly banned users now back on the
(00:13:34)
platform after Musk's Thanksgiving tweet
(00:13:36)
that amnesty begins next week.
(00:13:39)
>> Yeah, he basically reinstated a bunch of
(00:13:41)
accounts, including white supremacists,
(00:13:43)
and announced it on Thanksgiving, which
(00:13:45)
when you think about it, is actually
(00:13:46)
pretty thematically appropriate for the
(00:13:48)
holiday. And when you take all of that
(00:13:50)
together, it is no wonder the site
(00:13:52)
became a fertile breeding ground for
(00:13:54)
hatred and misinformation and much less
(00:13:57)
reliable when it came to tracking
(00:13:59)
breaking news. One of the first clear
(00:14:01)
signs of that came in the wake of the
(00:14:02)
October 7th attacks in Israel.
(00:14:03)
Previously, at a moment like that,
(00:14:05)
people might look to Twitter for
(00:14:07)
information from journalists and other
(00:14:08)
credible people on the scene. But a ton
(00:14:11)
of misinformation circulated there,
(00:14:13)
often from accounts boasting misleading
(00:14:15)
blue checks. This video of a grieving
(00:14:18)
boy supposedly from Gaza went viral even
(00:14:20)
though it was from at least 9 years
(00:14:21)
earlier and was taken in Syria. And this
(00:14:24)
clip supposedly of Israeli rockets
(00:14:25)
exploding was actually from a military
(00:14:27)
simulation video game. The account that
(00:14:29)
posted that, by the way, conveniently
(00:14:30)
titled Israel MSAD, had gone from fewer
(00:14:33)
than a thousand followers when it first
(00:14:34)
acquired a blue check in September 2023
(00:14:37)
to more than 230,000.
(00:14:39)
And that wasn't the only big change
(00:14:41)
because Twitter also started paying
(00:14:43)
so-called creators on the site.
(00:14:45)
Currently, if you're a premium user,
(00:14:47)
meaning you pay for a blue check, you
(00:14:49)
can get paid for your posts and your
(00:14:51)
revenue is dependent on how many other
(00:14:53)
premium users reply to, repost, and like
(00:14:56)
your content. And that has served some
(00:14:59)
users pretty well, like this guy who
(00:15:00)
posted as freedom uncut online and was
(00:15:03)
on Twitter a lot.
(00:15:05)
>> He says he spends up to 16 hours a day
(00:15:07)
on X, sharing AI generated pictures like
(00:15:10)
these and streaming. While some of these
(00:15:12)
posts are obviously satirical, others
(00:15:14)
are less fantastical. It's the more
(00:15:16)
provocative content that gets views. He
(00:15:18)
tells me
(00:15:19)
>> it's kind of interesting because
(00:15:22)
the the balance between free speech and
(00:15:26)
saying stuff that you know is either
(00:15:29)
untrue or you just say it in a very
(00:15:32)
brash way to egg people on. Uh is is an
(00:15:38)
interesting era that we're in. I know
(00:15:40)
people that are making the the pay
(00:15:42)
periods every 2 weeks and I know people
(00:15:44)
that are in the thousand plus range.
(00:15:48)
>> Look, it is not the most important thing
(00:15:50)
there, but it is genuinely incredible to
(00:15:52)
me that people can make money posting
(00:15:54)
Matrix memes of Trump that read I can
(00:15:57)
dodge bullets. Not least because that's
(00:15:59)
something, and not to be a fact
(00:16:01)
here, Trump didn't entirely do. if we're
(00:16:04)
just going to be stickers about it. And
(00:16:09)
look, over $1,000
(00:16:12)
every two weeks is clearly a good payday
(00:16:14)
just for posting. Usually to make that
(00:16:16)
kind of money online, you need to be
(00:16:17)
running a crypto scam or selling feet
(00:16:20)
pics. And that's even that is only
(00:16:21)
realistic for those of us who happen to
(00:16:23)
be born with irresistible feet. I I
(00:16:25)
would show you, but honey, I don't do
(00:16:27)
that for free.
(00:16:30)
And some accounts, particularly on the
(00:16:32)
far right, have even made more, like the
(00:16:34)
anonymous end wokeness, which once
(00:16:36)
tweeted, "Wow, Elon Musk wasn't kidding.
(00:16:38)
Content monetization is real." With a
(00:16:40)
screenshot showing earnings of over
(00:16:42)
$10,000. Now, I should say most accounts
(00:16:45)
don't make that much, but even
(00:16:46)
relatively small amounts can be an
(00:16:48)
incentive if, say, you live in another
(00:16:50)
country where the cost of living is
(00:16:52)
lower. And that may help explain the
(00:16:54)
somewhat awkward revelations that came
(00:16:56)
last year when Twitter suddenly allowed
(00:16:58)
people to see accounts location
(00:17:00)
information.
(00:17:01)
>> The exac account Mag with nearly 400,000
(00:17:04)
followers boasts itself as standing
(00:17:07)
strong with President Trump and America
(00:17:09)
First with post after post backing
(00:17:11)
Trump. But OneClick shows it's based in
(00:17:14)
Eastern Europe. Even President Trump
(00:17:16)
himself reposting several accounts that
(00:17:18)
are not from the United States on his
(00:17:20)
truth social platform. like this account
(00:17:22)
called commentary Donald Trump posting
(00:17:24)
about whether foreignb born citizens
(00:17:26)
should be barred from running for
(00:17:27)
office. The account itself based in
(00:17:30)
Africa.
(00:17:31)
>> Yeah. And that is not all. An account
(00:17:33)
called ultra magump2028 claiming to be
(00:17:36)
based in DC was also listed as being in
(00:17:38)
Africa. The account MAGA Nadine was
(00:17:40)
based in Morocco. And the user at
(00:17:42)
American was based in Pakistan
(00:17:45)
which is pretty surprising. Finding out
(00:17:47)
an account called at American is based
(00:17:48)
outside the US is kind of like finding
(00:17:50)
out that the person who runs Dumoir is
(00:17:53)
David Atenburgh. I mean sure it's not
(00:17:56)
illegal and I guess maybe the passion
(00:17:58)
could be real but it certainly changes
(00:18:00)
how I think about things. The point is
(00:18:03)
there is an ecosystem of people both
(00:18:05)
here and abroad who've discovered you
(00:18:07)
can make money off of pissed Americans
(00:18:09)
staring at their phones. And to be
(00:18:11)
clear, none of the changes I've
(00:18:12)
mentioned so far involved secret tweaks
(00:18:14)
to Twitter's algorithm. They just
(00:18:16)
involved changing who could post and
(00:18:19)
what their incentives were. As for
(00:18:21)
what's happened behind the scenes, that
(00:18:24)
is harder to say, though. Some who've
(00:18:25)
run experiments on the site have made
(00:18:27)
some troubling discoveries. Last year,
(00:18:29)
Sky News created a number of accounts
(00:18:30)
emulating British Twitter users. Three
(00:18:32)
were leftwing users, three were
(00:18:34)
right-wing, and three were neutral,
(00:18:36)
designed to show no interest in
(00:18:37)
politics. And when they tracked the
(00:18:39)
content each was pushed by Twitter's
(00:18:41)
algorithm, their findings were striking.
(00:18:44)
>> The result was that every account, no
(00:18:45)
matter their political orientation, was
(00:18:47)
fed a glut of right-wing content.
(00:18:50)
Remember our left-wing users. This shows
(00:18:52)
what they saw on the platform, and more
(00:18:54)
than 40% came from right-wing accounts.
(00:18:58)
Compare that to our right-wing users,
(00:19:00)
and look, they saw much less left-wing
(00:19:02)
content and a lot of right-wing content.
(00:19:06)
And then the neutral users who we
(00:19:07)
designed not to show any interest in
(00:19:09)
politics. They saw twice as much
(00:19:12)
right-wing content in the pink here than
(00:19:14)
they did leftwing in yellow. And that
(00:19:16)
clearly suggests that something is up.
(00:19:19)
Even if we don't know the exact
(00:19:20)
algorithm changes that were made. It's
(00:19:22)
like when a Redditor found that
(00:19:23)
statistically James Harden's poor
(00:19:25)
performance during away games correlates
(00:19:27)
with them happening in cities with
(00:19:29)
highly rated strip clubs. Now, can we
(00:19:32)
make concrete statements about causality
(00:19:34)
there? Of course we can't. But the data
(00:19:36)
is making some loud suggestions.
(00:19:39)
Now, I have to say X has announced a new
(00:19:42)
update to Twitter's algorithm, which
(00:19:43)
they've dubbed as purely AIEL. Although
(00:19:46)
given Elon has a history of trying to
(00:19:47)
make his AI chatbot grock less woke,
(00:19:50)
leading to it at one point calling
(00:19:51)
itself Mecca Hitler. I'm not sure how
(00:19:54)
reassuring that is. Also, Elon's
(00:19:57)
definitely shown a willingness to tweak
(00:19:59)
Twitter's algorithm to drive certain
(00:20:01)
kinds of content, and sometimes for
(00:20:04)
truly embarrassing reasons. There's a
(00:20:06)
notorious incident involving him going
(00:20:07)
to the Super Bowl in 2023 and having a
(00:20:10)
problem with one of his tweets, and I'll
(00:20:11)
let this reporter fill you in.
(00:20:13)
>> He tweets out basically his support for
(00:20:16)
the Philadelphia Eagles. I think his
(00:20:18)
tweet was something like, "Go Eagles!"
(00:20:19)
with a few American flags on it.
(00:20:22)
Biden around the same time posts a
(00:20:25)
somewhat similar tweet.
(00:20:27)
Fly Eagles fly. And it's a video of his
(00:20:30)
wife Joe Biden who's walking with an
(00:20:31)
Eagles jersey on. The game goes on. Elon
(00:20:35)
Musk checks his phone. Weird. It looks
(00:20:38)
like Joe Biden, who he's called a damp
(00:20:40)
sock puppet in human form, is doing much
(00:20:44)
better than he is in terms of engagement
(00:20:46)
on this very similar tweet. At 2:36
(00:20:49)
a.m., she says an urgent message went
(00:20:51)
out and roughly 80 engineers were pulled
(00:20:53)
into work.
(00:20:54)
>> And they're tasked with fixing the
(00:20:58)
issues with the algorithm.
(00:21:01)
>> That's true. Elon's tweets got less
(00:21:03)
engagement than Biden's did. So 80
(00:21:05)
engineers were called in at 2 in the
(00:21:07)
morning and told this is high urgency.
(00:21:10)
And of course, his tweet flopped. It was
(00:21:12)
terrible. First, don't use American
(00:21:14)
flags when eagle emojis exist. But also
(00:21:16)
eagles. Why call them by their
(00:21:18)
government name? Just post go birds,
(00:21:20)
eagle emojis, Jaylen Herz can give me a
(00:21:22)
tush push any day and you'd have cracked
(00:21:24)
a million likes instantly. Now,
(00:21:27)
reporters later learned that after Musk
(00:21:29)
threatened to fire his remaining
(00:21:30)
engineers, they built a system designed
(00:21:32)
to ensure that he and he alone benefited
(00:21:35)
from previously unheard of promotion of
(00:21:36)
his tweets to the entire user base,
(00:21:39)
which seems to be happening as basically
(00:21:42)
whatever Elon's tweeting about, people
(00:21:44)
will see it in their feeds. When Fortune
(00:21:46)
conducted an experiment to gauge how
(00:21:48)
prevalent Musk was on Twitter, they set
(00:21:49)
up a dozen different test accounts. And
(00:21:51)
in approximately 90% of the sessions
(00:21:54)
they conducted, a post from Musk
(00:21:56)
appeared at least once in the timeline,
(00:21:58)
usually much more often. And even
(00:22:00)
clicking not interested in Elon Musk,
(00:22:03)
didn't change things. In fact, after one
(00:22:04)
test account clicked exactly that, posts
(00:22:07)
from him more than doubled. At this
(00:22:10)
point, it seems like there's only one
(00:22:12)
option if you never want to hear
(00:22:13)
anything from Elon Musk, and that's to
(00:22:14)
be his coolest child.
(00:22:17)
and Twitter thumbming the scale toward
(00:22:20)
Elon's interest is bad for multiple
(00:22:22)
reasons, not limited to his god-awful
(00:22:24)
jokes, his history of invoking extreme
(00:22:26)
ideas like the anti-semitic great
(00:22:27)
replacement theory, and the fact he was
(00:22:29)
apparently a driver of US election
(00:22:30)
misinformation in 2024. But perhaps the
(00:22:34)
biggest cause for concern is the fact
(00:22:36)
that our current government is
(00:22:38)
troublingly dependent on Elon's
(00:22:40)
platform. The Trump administration is
(00:22:42)
painfully online and particularly on
(00:22:44)
Twitter. JD Vance has said that he's a
(00:22:46)
Grock guy. Cash Mattel's repeatedly
(00:22:49)
fumbled FBI investigations by
(00:22:50)
prematurely announcing suspects on
(00:22:52)
Twitter. And this photo of the makeshift
(00:22:55)
situation room during the US military
(00:22:56)
operation in Venezuela showed a Twitter
(00:22:58)
feed with Venezuela
(00:23:01)
in the search bar. And I'm not sure
(00:23:04)
anything could inspire less confidence
(00:23:06)
than that other than the Google results
(00:23:07)
for who is Venezuela.
(00:23:10)
And at best, the consequences of doing
(00:23:13)
this are that the government just ends
(00:23:15)
up doing dumb stuff, like when someone
(00:23:17)
on Twitter seemed to convince Elon that
(00:23:19)
the gold inside Fort Knox might be
(00:23:21)
missing. The Washington Post traced it
(00:23:24)
back to this tweet, suggesting he take a
(00:23:26)
look to make sure it was still there.
(00:23:27)
Musk replied, "Surely it's reviewed
(00:23:29)
every year." To which the account
(00:23:30)
responded, "It should be. It isn't."
(00:23:33)
Just 2 days later, Mus tweeted, "It
(00:23:35)
would be cool to do a live video
(00:23:36)
walkthrough of Fort Knox." And not long
(00:23:38)
after that, this came out of the mouth
(00:23:41)
of the president of the United States.
(00:23:43)
>> We're actually going to Fort Knox to see
(00:23:45)
if the gold is there, cuz maybe somebody
(00:23:47)
stole the gold. Tons of gold.
(00:23:50)
>> Okay.
(00:23:52)
Well, let us know, I guess.
(00:23:56)
Honestly, I know it's probably not a
(00:23:58)
great use of taxpayer money, but I think
(00:24:00)
I'd be okay if he spent the rest of his
(00:24:03)
presidency trying to solve low stakes
(00:24:05)
mysteries he found on Twitter.
(00:24:07)
Visiting Fort Knox because someone said
(00:24:09)
the golds might be missing or pouring
(00:24:11)
around in the White House garden with a
(00:24:13)
magnifying glass because Courtney
(00:24:14)
Kardashian once tweeted, "Do ants have
(00:24:16)
dicks?" It wouldn't be the worst use of
(00:24:20)
his time. Anything that keeps him busy,
(00:24:23)
really?
(00:24:24)
But wild gold chases are the best case
(00:24:27)
scenario here because we've talked
(00:24:28)
before about how misinformation on
(00:24:30)
Twitter led to actual spending cuts
(00:24:32)
during Elon's time at Doge, but it goes
(00:24:34)
well beyond that. A nominee for a senior
(00:24:38)
administration post recently told the
(00:24:40)
New Yorker, "If we have something that's
(00:24:41)
popular in right-wing Twitter, the White
(00:24:43)
House is acting on it 90 plus% of the
(00:24:46)
time." And Trump appointees like Har
(00:24:48)
Dylan, the assistant attorney general
(00:24:50)
for civil rights, will sometimes openly
(00:24:52)
brag about taking work cues from social
(00:24:55)
media.
(00:24:56)
>> I have a big social media following from
(00:24:58)
before I joined the DOJ and about 1.5
(00:25:00)
million plus followers online. It is a
(00:25:03)
way to find information. today. I don't
(00:25:05)
actually watch television very much. Um
(00:25:07)
I'm not, you know, I don't have the TV
(00:25:09)
on in the background because TV is like
(00:25:11)
12 to 24 hours behind what's really
(00:25:13)
happening. And when the modern-day
(00:25:16)
journalist heroes who are the Nick
(00:25:18)
Shirley's and and you know, the Matt
(00:25:20)
Taibis and some of these others who uh
(00:25:22)
you know, right or left, they're the
(00:25:24)
ones who are getting the leads and
(00:25:26)
sharing the stories in real time. Those
(00:25:28)
those are the ones I pay attention to
(00:25:30)
and where we get our attention on
(00:25:32)
something. or libs of Tik Tok is also a
(00:25:34)
great source for some of our uh issues
(00:25:37)
involving schools or employment. We do
(00:25:39)
open up investigations based on internet
(00:25:41)
leads and I I am proud of that.
(00:25:44)
>> Okay, first bragging about your Twitter
(00:25:46)
followers is just embarrassing and it
(00:25:48)
gets even worse when you learn that last
(00:25:50)
December Dylan tweeted, "I've been stuck
(00:25:52)
at pretty much the same level of
(00:25:54)
followers on this account since I
(00:25:55)
started my government job. What am I
(00:25:57)
chop liver over here? What kind of
(00:25:59)
content do my folks want to see more of
(00:26:01)
to like and share? To which I'd respond,
(00:26:04)
I guess I'd love to see a resignation
(00:26:06)
letter if you're taking requests. But
(00:26:08)
also, it's a little hard to hear her
(00:26:11)
complain about a lack of followers given
(00:26:13)
she routinely pumps out duds like this
(00:26:15)
recent one on the road timeline cleanse
(00:26:18)
knitting after a day of hard work.
(00:26:20)
Cashmir hat for a man. And this one also
(00:26:23)
about a hat, but in which he throws in
(00:26:24)
the arur for good measure. AND WHAT THE
(00:26:28)
IS THAT? THAT IS A HARD unfollow
(00:26:31)
for me for the assistant attorney
(00:26:33)
general for civil rights. But but there
(00:26:36)
are obvious issues with the government
(00:26:38)
taking cues from accounts that Dylan
(00:26:40)
Justice described because some are
(00:26:42)
posting deeply irresponsible rage bait.
(00:26:45)
Take a guy that she just mentioned
(00:26:46)
there, Nick Shirley. He's the
(00:26:47)
23-year-old right-wing influencer behind
(00:26:49)
a viral investigation of Minnesota
(00:26:52)
daycarees posted in December. Uh they
(00:26:54)
were actually playing a clip of it
(00:26:56)
during her interview there. Shirley
(00:26:57)
posted it on YouTube first, but it
(00:26:59)
quickly went viral on Twitter where it
(00:27:01)
so far garnered over 140 million views.
(00:27:04)
And it's worth knowing just how flimsy
(00:27:06)
it was. For context, allegations of
(00:27:09)
social services fraud in Minnesota, some
(00:27:10)
of it by Somali Americans have been the
(00:27:12)
subject of federal investigations and
(00:27:14)
mainstream media coverage for years now.
(00:27:16)
Dozens of people have already been
(00:27:18)
convicted as a result, with some
(00:27:19)
investigations still ongoing. Still,
(00:27:22)
Nick Shirley decided to do some
(00:27:24)
investigating of his own by showing up
(00:27:26)
at daycarees, demanding to see proof
(00:27:28)
kids went there, and in some instances
(00:27:30)
asking if he could enroll his
(00:27:32)
non-existent child. When he wasn't able
(00:27:34)
to do that, he concluded the businesses
(00:27:36)
were fronts. It was a truly ridiculous
(00:27:39)
stunt as he sort of acknowledged when
(00:27:41)
pressed on it by an actual reporter.
(00:27:43)
>> But surely you don't think a daycare
(00:27:45)
should just be unlocked. You shouldn't
(00:27:47)
be able to just walk into a dayare.
(00:27:48)
>> Be a reception. What it is?
(00:27:49)
>> No, they every daycare is locked.
(00:27:52)
>> Has their doors are locked.
(00:27:54)
>> Okay, you bring up a fair point then,
(00:27:56)
but why can't they actually give me
(00:27:57)
information how to enroll a child?
(00:27:59)
>> Okay, first I love the slight pause
(00:28:01)
there after Shirley was told daycarees
(00:28:03)
are not typically open to strangers with
(00:28:05)
cameras. Just the slow realization that
(00:28:07)
a locked door is one of the basic things
(00:28:10)
every daycare should have along with
(00:28:12)
crayons, interlocking foam tiles, tiny
(00:28:14)
tables and chairs, and so many germs.
(00:28:16)
Every part of the insides will be coated
(00:28:17)
with flem for the next two years
(00:28:18)
straight. THAT IS WHAT DAYCARES ARE. BUT
(00:28:21)
ALSO, if you really want the latest
(00:28:24)
right-wing rallying cry to be daycare
(00:28:26)
should have a guest reception for random
(00:28:28)
men without children who just want to
(00:28:29)
poke around and film some I'd love
(00:28:32)
to see how that turns out for you. Now,
(00:28:35)
you won't be surprised to learn that
(00:28:36)
state investigators conducted compliance
(00:28:38)
checks after Shirley's video went viral
(00:28:40)
and found that the daycarees he visited
(00:28:41)
were operating as expected and the kids
(00:28:44)
were present at all sites except for
(00:28:45)
one. And that is only because it wasn't
(00:28:47)
yet open for families for the day when
(00:28:49)
inspectors arrived. But the thing is, it
(00:28:51)
was already too late because Elon
(00:28:54)
absolutely loved that dumb video. He
(00:28:56)
tweeted, retweeted, and engaged with a
(00:28:59)
truly absurd number of posts about it or
(00:29:01)
the claims that it made in the days
(00:29:03)
after the video went online. And
(00:29:05)
unsurprisingly, the Trump administration
(00:29:07)
took notice. The day after it was
(00:29:09)
posted, JD Vance tweeted about it,
(00:29:11)
saying it was more useful journalism
(00:29:12)
than any of the winners of the 2024
(00:29:14)
pulit prizes, which given one of them
(00:29:16)
focused on tactics authoritarian regimes
(00:29:19)
used to repress descent in the digital
(00:29:21)
age feels a bit on the nose. Two days
(00:29:24)
after that, Christine Ome posted a clip
(00:29:25)
of ICE agents apparently conducting a
(00:29:27)
massive investigation into childcare
(00:29:29)
fraud in Minneapolis. And the next day,
(00:29:32)
Trump's then deputy secretary at HHS
(00:29:34)
posted on Twitter tagging Nick Shirley
(00:29:37)
and including this video that was then
(00:29:38)
retweeted by HHS. Intrepid journalists
(00:29:42)
have made shocking and credible
(00:29:43)
allegations of extensive fraud in
(00:29:45)
Minnesota's childare programs. We
(00:29:48)
believe the state of Minnesota has
(00:29:49)
allowed scammers and fake daycarees to
(00:29:51)
siphon millions of taxpayer dollars over
(00:29:53)
the past decade.
(00:29:54)
>> Wow. Look, I know it is distracting
(00:29:56)
because that man is hot as
(00:30:00)
but if you can listen to his words
(00:30:02)
through the SMOKE SHOW GOING ON THERE,
(00:30:06)
they're actually very worrying. In that
(00:30:09)
post, they announced they've frozen
(00:30:11)
funding to Minnesota and then quickly
(00:30:13)
tried expanding that to encompass five
(00:30:15)
Democratic run states. And within two
(00:30:17)
weeks, the Trump administration sent
(00:30:19)
thousands of federal agents to Minnesota
(00:30:21)
to crack down on illegal immigration. I
(00:30:24)
don't think it's a stretch to say that a
(00:30:26)
lot of the you saw in Minnesota was
(00:30:28)
caused, at least in part, by this
(00:30:30)
tweet. The point here is Twitter
(00:30:33)
has become a sewer of misinformation
(00:30:35)
with the power to bring about troubling
(00:30:37)
real world impacts. And to be clear,
(00:30:39)
this is now a problem that goes far
(00:30:41)
beyond this administration or this
(00:30:44)
country. Because to see just how
(00:30:46)
dangerous what Elon's built can be, we
(00:30:48)
actually have to look at England. In
(00:30:49)
2024, in a town called Southport, three
(00:30:52)
young girls were killed in a knife
(00:30:53)
attack. It was horrific. In the
(00:30:55)
immediate aftermath, there was almost no
(00:30:57)
public information available about the
(00:30:59)
attacker. But nevertheless, a Twitter
(00:31:01)
account called Europe Invasion, known to
(00:31:03)
publish anti-immigrant and Islamophobic
(00:31:04)
content, baselessly suggested the
(00:31:07)
suspect was a Muslim immigrant. By the
(00:31:08)
time the killer was identified as a
(00:31:10)
non-Muslim British citizen born to
(00:31:13)
parents from Rwanda, it was already too
(00:31:14)
late as mobs were forming. And after a
(00:31:17)
vigil for the victims, violence broke
(00:31:19)
out near a local mosque with people
(00:31:21)
throwing bricks, bottles, and other
(00:31:22)
missiles at it. And the Imam there still
(00:31:25)
seemed stunned by the speed with which
(00:31:27)
it all accelerated. We start getting
(00:31:31)
messages from friends and neighbors and
(00:31:34)
saying there is a lot of people accusing
(00:31:38)
the attacker of being a Muslim and then
(00:31:42)
it's moving from there. They said it he
(00:31:45)
is coming to this mosque and then it
(00:31:48)
moved from there very quickly. We're
(00:31:50)
talking about within half an hour it
(00:31:53)
became that we coerced him into doing
(00:31:56)
what he did. Did you ever expect that it
(00:31:58)
would end up that hatred would end up
(00:32:01)
outside your mosque?
(00:32:02)
>> Never.
(00:32:03)
>> That is terrible. And given the killer
(00:32:06)
wasn't a member of that mosque or indeed
(00:32:08)
Muslim, of course you wouldn't expect a
(00:32:11)
hate mob to show up. It makes literally
(00:32:12)
as much sense as a mob showing up at a
(00:32:14)
Taco Bell to protest the results of an
(00:32:16)
Orlando Magic game. Hey guys, those two
(00:32:19)
things are unrelated. You got some bad
(00:32:21)
intel. Go home, you idiots.
(00:32:25)
But from there, the riots spread
(00:32:28)
nationwide with mobs targeting mosques
(00:32:30)
and hotels housing asylum seekers and
(00:32:32)
leading to what's been called the worst
(00:32:34)
unrest the UK has seen in more than a
(00:32:37)
decade. And it was significantly fueled
(00:32:39)
by Twitter with false or unfounded
(00:32:41)
claims about the Southport attacker
(00:32:43)
getting at least 155 million impressions
(00:32:46)
in the days after the attack. And when
(00:32:47)
the police there eventually made arrests
(00:32:49)
for inciting racial hatred, one of the
(00:32:51)
men convicted happened to be earning
(00:32:53)
£1,400 a month from his activities on
(00:32:56)
the site. And it is hard to deny
(00:32:59)
Twitter's role as at the very least an
(00:33:01)
accelerant. Two of the major voices
(00:33:04)
spreading dangerous misinformation were
(00:33:05)
Andrew Tate and Tommy Robinson who
(00:33:06)
remember Elon reinstated to the
(00:33:08)
platform. Elon himself was acting as a
(00:33:11)
sort of amplifier to the point that he
(00:33:12)
replied to one post about the attacks
(00:33:14)
with civil war is inevitable. And it's
(00:33:18)
not like some of the key participants
(00:33:20)
have denied how critical Twitter's role
(00:33:23)
has been. Robertson's farright movement
(00:33:24)
picked up significant steam in the wake
(00:33:27)
of Southport. And here he is not long
(00:33:28)
after the riots, giving credit where he
(00:33:31)
feels it's due.
(00:33:32)
>> Look what we've achieved in 6 months.
(00:33:34)
We've gone from through the roof thanks
(00:33:36)
to Elon Musk. built a cult movement
(00:33:38)
ready. Inspired many
(00:33:42)
and uh we're ready.
(00:33:45)
>> Yeah. Not great. And if that wasn't bad
(00:33:47)
enough, Robinson actually hosted an
(00:33:49)
anti-immigration the kingdom rally in
(00:33:52)
London last year. And you'll never guess
(00:33:54)
who he managed to get as a special
(00:33:56)
guest.
(00:33:57)
>> The huge crowds in Westminster didn't
(00:33:59)
turn out just for Tommy Robinson.
(00:34:01)
They're also chanting someone else's
(00:34:03)
name.
(00:34:06)
Elon Musk joining in from America.
(00:34:08)
>> Whether you choose violence or not,
(00:34:09)
violence is coming to you, you either
(00:34:12)
fight back or you die.
(00:34:15)
>> Okay, saying fight back or die to that
(00:34:18)
crowd is so malevolent I can barely wrap
(00:34:21)
my head around it. And I I've got to say
(00:34:24)
what he's doing there sure does seem
(00:34:25)
like a strong case of, if I may quote
(00:34:27)
Elon himself, someone whispering
(00:34:29)
terrible things, things that weren't
(00:34:31)
true and they're pushing a neistic
(00:34:33)
anti-vilizational mind virus to the
(00:34:35)
world. It is worm tonguecoded at least
(00:34:39)
is what I am saying here. And look, this
(00:34:42)
is typically where I trot out my hit
(00:34:44)
catchphrase, what can we do? You know
(00:34:46)
it. People go crazy when I say it's on
(00:34:47)
t-shirts now and I can't walk down the
(00:34:49)
street without people begging me to say
(00:34:51)
it to them. But right now,
(00:34:53)
unfortunately, there's not much we can
(00:34:55)
push for by way of solutions. The fact
(00:34:56)
is, a massive media platform has been
(00:34:59)
shaped in the image of its poisonous
(00:35:01)
owner. And it doesn't seem like Elon's
(00:35:03)
going to see the error of his ways
(00:35:04)
anytime soon, seeing his brain seems to
(00:35:07)
be thoroughly cooked by the garbage he
(00:35:09)
consumes on his own site. To be honest,
(00:35:11)
he still doesn't seem to have a coherent
(00:35:14)
vision of exactly what Twitter should
(00:35:15)
be. Because just watch this recent
(00:35:17)
interview where he offers a pretty grand
(00:35:19)
vision for it, but then gets tripped up
(00:35:21)
by the most basic follow-up question
(00:35:23)
imaginable. And I promise this answer is
(00:35:26)
so much worse than you are prepared for.
(00:35:30)
>> I just want to really have um a a global
(00:35:32)
platform that brings together
(00:35:35)
like like I said like it's becomes close
(00:35:37)
to sort of a collective consciousness
(00:35:40)
uh of humanity as possible. And why is
(00:35:42)
that important you know collective
(00:35:44)
consciousness to have one platform?
(00:35:47)
>> I I guess uh
(00:35:50)
>> yeah why is that important? Um
(00:36:01)
I I guess it's you could also say like
(00:36:03)
like why uh
(00:36:06)
you know if you consider humans like
(00:36:08)
humans are composed of around 30 to 40
(00:36:11)
trillion cells. Um
(00:36:15)
and
(00:36:17)
you know there's trillions of synap
(00:36:19)
synapses in your in your mind. Um
(00:36:25)
but but but there's there's no the why
(00:36:28)
of it. I mean I guess it's just so we
(00:36:30)
can
(00:36:32)
increase
(00:36:34)
our understanding our our understand
(00:36:36)
increase our
(00:36:40)
understanding of the the universe.
(00:36:43)
You know, at first I thought that was
(00:36:47)
embarrassing, but with the full 10
(00:36:48)
seconds where Elon's brain seemed to
(00:36:50)
buffer like it's loading a video on AOL
(00:36:52)
in 1999. But then I saw the little
(00:36:55)
drawing labeled 30 to 40 trillion cells,
(00:36:58)
and it all totally made sense.
(00:37:01)
So, it seems like the odds of Elon
(00:37:03)
fixing this are pretty slim. Meaning,
(00:37:05)
all we can really control is how we each
(00:37:07)
interact with Twitter. And I know that
(00:37:09)
there are some out there who think it's
(00:37:10)
important to stay on it to be part of
(00:37:12)
the town square. Although given that
(00:37:14)
town square now resembles, if anything,
(00:37:16)
this I'm not sure much good faith debate
(00:37:19)
is taking place there. My personal
(00:37:21)
advice is not to post on it at all. I
(00:37:23)
haven't done that in over a year.
(00:37:24)
Although I will be going back there
(00:37:26)
tomorrow to post a link to this piece
(00:37:28)
before going silent again and
(00:37:30)
prioritizing my only fans.
(00:37:32)
And look, I know people have their own
(00:37:36)
reasons for staying on Twitter, though,
(00:37:37)
for what it's worth, a lot of what it
(00:37:39)
does can be replicated elsewhere. If you
(00:37:41)
want to stay in touch with friends or
(00:37:42)
contacts, maybe try and connect with
(00:37:44)
them somewhere else. If you spend most
(00:37:45)
of your time sending your significant
(00:37:46)
other memes and funny posts, there are
(00:37:48)
other sites where you can find those,
(00:37:50)
but also maybe put your phone down and
(00:37:52)
take your wife out to dinner. It's been
(00:37:53)
a long time since you went out without
(00:37:54)
the kids. And if you just want to watch
(00:37:57)
arguments, may I recommend the Real
(00:37:59)
Housewives franchises, the Shakespeare
(00:38:02)
of the modern age, all I'll say is there
(00:38:04)
are certain areas like news in
(00:38:06)
particular where Twitter is now worse
(00:38:09)
than useless. In fact, for breaking
(00:38:11)
news, it is an active liability as
(00:38:14)
people routinely push out false
(00:38:16)
information in the wake of tragedies and
(00:38:18)
crises, often for money, and there don't
(00:38:20)
seem to be many guardrails to stop them.
(00:38:22)
All of which is really a long way of
(00:38:24)
saying that the Twitter that we may have
(00:38:26)
once relied on and the Twitter that was
(00:38:29)
fun and occasionally useful is just well
(00:38:31)
and truly gone. And collectively, while
(00:38:34)
it might be sad, it might be past time
(00:38:36)
for all of us too, if I may borrow a
(00:38:38)
truly poisoned phrase.
(00:38:40)
Let that
(00:38:42)
sink in.
(00:38:44)
That's our show. Thanks so much for
(00:38:46)
watching. We'll see you next week. Good
(00:38:48)
night.
(00:38:51)
How about this for a parnip?
(00:38:53)
Straight out of my raised bed. The
(00:38:56)
raised bed
(00:38:58)
is from there
(00:39:00)
down to there. And the parsnip has gone
(00:39:03)
from top to bottom.
(00:39:05)
We'll enjoy that today.
(00:39:08)
Always beautiful. We love parsnip in
(00:39:10)
lots of different ways.
(00:39:13)
Cheers.
