↔
Title: Think the Outcome of the Civil War Was Wrong? The Supreme Court Might Agree
Duration: 00:09:58
Total Correct Answers:
Current Caption
Correct
Learning Modes
YouTube Video Transcript Hide
Ask AI:
Export as:
Ask AI Result
The ask AI result will appear here..
(00:00:00) Your YouTube transcript will appear here
(00:00:01)
The 14th amendment, you say, is clear.
(00:00:03)
It says all persons born or naturalized
(00:00:05)
in the United States and subject to the
(00:00:07)
jurisdiction thereof are citizens of the
(00:00:09)
United States. Everybody can see what
(00:00:11)
that means. Born in the United States,
(00:00:13)
it's clear. Are these people idiots? Not
(00:00:15)
so fast. They might be idiots, but
(00:00:17)
America's hard right isn't attacking the
(00:00:19)
all persons born part. Go back to the
(00:00:21)
language and subject to the jurisdiction
(00:00:24)
thereof. That's the part they're going
(00:00:26)
after. and who gets to determine
(00:00:28)
jurisdiction and therefore citizenship.
(00:00:30)
This president, of course. But where you
(00:00:33)
stand on that might reveal not what you
(00:00:35)
think about the advance of civil
(00:00:36)
liberties in the 20th century, but the
(00:00:38)
outcome of the Civil War in the 19th.
(00:00:41)
Hey folks, I'm Tad Sturmer. I'm the
(00:00:43)
author of Resistance History of the
(00:00:44)
United States and an American scholar of
(00:00:46)
resistance history in the American
(00:00:48)
founding at the University of Southern
(00:00:49)
Denmark.
(00:00:51)
The founders, the folks whom Henry David
(00:00:53)
Thorough derisively called the men of
(00:00:56)
87, had a plan for citizenship. You hear
(00:00:59)
lots of people yammering on about how
(00:01:01)
American independence was so great
(00:01:02)
because it turned subjects into
(00:01:03)
citizens. Let's look at that more
(00:01:05)
closely. Let's understand what those
(00:01:07)
words in fact mean. Not just in our
(00:01:09)
patriotic fever dream. It wasn't about
(00:01:11)
democracy versus tyranny. Can anybody
(00:01:13)
pay attention to the history here?
(00:01:15)
Parliament, you know, the elected
(00:01:16)
representatives of the people had been
(00:01:18)
running Britain for a century. The
(00:01:20)
founders weren't escaping autocracy.
(00:01:22)
They were renegotiating terms. Here's
(00:01:25)
what actually changed. Subject and
(00:01:27)
citizen, just legal categories. Don't
(00:01:29)
get wrapped up in what those words might
(00:01:31)
have meant in the 15th century under the
(00:01:33)
tutors. Think about what they meant in
(00:01:35)
the 18th and actually what they mean
(00:01:36)
today. They define who gets the
(00:01:38)
protection of the state, not just as
(00:01:40)
penalties. Who gets access to courts?
(00:01:42)
Who can own property? Who counts? Under
(00:01:45)
British law, subjecthood was broad.
(00:01:48)
everyone equal under the king. But after
(00:01:50)
American independence, as the founders
(00:01:52)
figured out what it meant to be a
(00:01:54)
citizen, they centered on this key
(00:01:55)
principle. Subjects might be determined
(00:01:57)
by God or what nature's god might do to
(00:01:59)
roll the dice in the lottery of where
(00:02:01)
you were born. But citizenship is
(00:02:03)
determined by men, the men in charge,
(00:02:06)
them. And they wanted to stay in charge.
(00:02:09)
So guess who citizens got to be. In the
(00:02:11)
first republic, the question about
(00:02:13)
citizenship of those already here was
(00:02:15)
left up each state. But each state
(00:02:17)
excluded huge parts of the population.
(00:02:19)
And it ain't got nothing to do with
(00:02:20)
birthright. Black people, no. Indigenous
(00:02:23)
people, the real birthright folks, no.
(00:02:25)
That's how they built the first republic
(00:02:26)
as a minority ruled ethnostate. The
(00:02:29)
founders knew they would always be in
(00:02:30)
the minority. So they baked protecting
(00:02:32)
that into the foundational documents.
(00:02:35)
Now the basis of that minority rule was
(00:02:37)
of course slavery. But the mechanism was
(00:02:39)
not just the three-fifths clause and the
(00:02:41)
fugitive slave clause in the
(00:02:42)
constitution. It was the electoral
(00:02:43)
college, the power of the Senate
(00:02:45)
appointed by state legislatores until
(00:02:47)
the early part of the 20th century, the
(00:02:48)
shielding of the judiciary and its
(00:02:50)
dependence on the executive, and the
(00:02:52)
ability of a distinct minority to
(00:02:54)
perpetually block any changes to the
(00:02:56)
foundations of their power to the
(00:02:58)
constitution. They fashioned their fear
(00:03:00)
of democracy under a fiction that I'm
(00:03:03)
sure you've heard, if you get anywhere
(00:03:04)
near stubbing your toe in the federalist
(00:03:06)
papers, tyranny of the majority. A
(00:03:08)
phrase nobody ever said ever before.
(00:03:10)
invented by people who knew they'd
(00:03:12)
always be outnumbered and wanted to
(00:03:14)
maintain control anyway. And what
(00:03:16)
happened after that? American mythmakers
(00:03:18)
turned it into a virtue. Evidence of the
(00:03:20)
genius of American exceptionalism. Want
(00:03:22)
to continue to subjugate a fifth of the
(00:03:24)
population for your own financial
(00:03:25)
political gain? We got you. And the
(00:03:27)
first chance the founders had to make a
(00:03:29)
national statement about who could be a
(00:03:31)
citizen, who the jurisdiction of the
(00:03:32)
United States would apply to, they did
(00:03:35)
exactly what you think they'd do. And in
(00:03:37)
1790, they said that no women, no
(00:03:40)
indigenous people, and a key point here,
(00:03:42)
no black people, not enslaved people,
(00:03:44)
black people could become naturalized
(00:03:47)
citizens. They, the white Protestant men
(00:03:49)
in charge, would say who was a citizen
(00:03:51)
and who wouldn't be. Anyone who didn't
(00:03:54)
look, walk, and talk like them. Fast
(00:03:57)
forward to the 1850s and 70 years of
(00:03:59)
that exclusionary ethnostate machinery
(00:04:02)
working when a majority of the Supreme
(00:04:04)
Court decided Dread's gone. There were a
(00:04:06)
few opinions written for the majority,
(00:04:07)
but the one we remember was signed by
(00:04:09)
the Chief Justice Roger Tony of
(00:04:11)
Maryland. And he just stated the
(00:04:12)
obvious. The founding fathers never
(00:04:14)
intended for black people to ever have
(00:04:15)
rights in the United States. Forget
(00:04:17)
about even being citizens to ever have
(00:04:19)
any rights. And he was right. They
(00:04:21)
didn't. It wasn't novel to anyone in the
(00:04:23)
1850s. It didn't matter they they were
(00:04:26)
born here. It just mattered what color
(00:04:28)
of skin they had. But again, that wasn't
(00:04:30)
new. What was novel was how it showed
(00:04:33)
how deeply the enslaver power controlled
(00:04:35)
every branch of government and the
(00:04:36)
resistance to that first republic perked
(00:04:38)
up. Congress had shown it was never
(00:04:40)
going to do anything but strengthen
(00:04:41)
slavery when it passed the fugitive
(00:04:43)
slave act of 1850 which extended the
(00:04:45)
reach of enslavers even into free states
(00:04:47)
in the homes of abolitionists. And then
(00:04:50)
they let one of their own beat a US
(00:04:51)
senator bloody on the floor of the
(00:04:52)
senate over it.
(00:04:54)
The presidency had long been in the
(00:04:55)
pocket of the enslavers, usually held by
(00:04:57)
enslavers themselves, but then even
(00:04:59)
controlled by the ones from New England.
(00:05:01)
And now the judiciary showed that no
(00:05:03)
change was coming through that quarter.
(00:05:05)
DreadScott was just being consistent
(00:05:06)
with what every other branch of the
(00:05:08)
government was doing. By 1861, Congress
(00:05:11)
would pass a constitutional amendment to
(00:05:12)
forever ban itself from interfering with
(00:05:15)
slavery. The Corwin Amendment approved
(00:05:16)
hours before Lincoln's inauguration as
(00:05:18)
one last capitulation. Now, it never got
(00:05:21)
ratified, but that's cuz the war came.
(00:05:23)
That wasn't a betrayal of the founding.
(00:05:25)
It was its fulfillment. And the
(00:05:27)
radicals, including those who became
(00:05:29)
radical Republicans, saw all that. But
(00:05:31)
playing by the rules, was no longer
(00:05:33)
going to get it done. Would no longer
(00:05:36)
tear down the minority rule and the
(00:05:37)
slavery it was based on. So after
(00:05:39)
750,000 people died, after the United
(00:05:42)
States Army occupied the rebel states,
(00:05:44)
after the radicals seized the power to
(00:05:46)
abolish the basis of the minority rule
(00:05:48)
strangle hold, they then took the next
(00:05:50)
step to clearly spell out access to
(00:05:52)
rights in the 14th amendment.
(00:05:53)
Birthright, citizenship, and language
(00:05:55)
designed to be crystal clear, all
(00:05:57)
persons born. Now, the author of the
(00:05:59)
amendment was explicit that it applied
(00:06:01)
to everyone. Not all persons born who
(00:06:04)
would threaten the establishment's hold
(00:06:06)
of minority rule. Not all persons born
(00:06:08)
whom Congress deems worthy. Not all
(00:06:10)
persons born whose parents have proper
(00:06:11)
allegiance. All persons born and thereby
(00:06:15)
take another swipe at the constitutional
(00:06:17)
mechanisms of minority rule. Slavery the
(00:06:20)
foundation was gone but most of the
(00:06:21)
structure was still there. Change the
(00:06:23)
political nation then you might change
(00:06:25)
the political culture and change the
(00:06:26)
nature of freedom itself. It was the
(00:06:28)
real introduction of a chance of
(00:06:30)
democracy. That's the spirit of 1866 of
(00:06:33)
1867 of 1868. When a lot of people talk
(00:06:36)
about the things that make America
(00:06:37)
great, that they love about America, a
(00:06:39)
lot of us mean that America, that
(00:06:41)
moment. Those are real heroes, real
(00:06:42)
ideas, the real founding. The radical
(00:06:45)
Republicans thought they had taken
(00:06:47)
citizenship out of the hands of the
(00:06:48)
minority. But there were still holes.
(00:06:51)
The Second Republic had its own
(00:06:52)
exclusions. Much of the 14th Amendment
(00:06:54)
was gutted within a decade. Even Justice
(00:06:56)
Harlland's famous descent in Py versus
(00:06:58)
Ferguson, I'm sure you've heard all this
(00:06:59)
one, the one everyone cites, it needs
(00:07:01)
some teasing out. Yes, he wrote, "Our
(00:07:04)
Constitution is colorblind and neither
(00:07:06)
knows nor tolerates classes among
(00:07:08)
citizens." Hooray. But then, as with all
(00:07:10)
things in history, you got to keep
(00:07:12)
going. The very next passage, there is a
(00:07:14)
race so different from our own that we
(00:07:16)
do not permit those belonging to it to
(00:07:18)
become citizens of the United States.
(00:07:20)
Persons belonging to it are with few
(00:07:22)
exceptions absolutely excluded from our
(00:07:25)
country. I allude to the Chinese race.
(00:07:29)
Still not everyone. Lots of people like
(00:07:31)
to site Wong Mark in 1898. Yeah. The
(00:07:34)
Supreme Court ruled 6 to2 that the San
(00:07:36)
Francisco born son of Chinese immigrant
(00:07:38)
was a citizen. Victory, right? Except
(00:07:40)
Wank Mark was detained in El Paso in
(00:07:42)
1901, three years after his Supreme
(00:07:45)
Court victory. Held for four months
(00:07:46)
while officials tried to deport him
(00:07:48)
again. He spent decades trying to bring
(00:07:50)
his sons to America. Repeatedly
(00:07:51)
challenged, repeatedly having to prove
(00:07:53)
what the Supreme Court supposedly had
(00:07:54)
already decided. So in 1931 he filed
(00:07:57)
notice that he was traveling to China
(00:07:59)
but planned to return but he never came
(00:08:01)
back. We think that he died there. Man
(00:08:03)
with a Supreme Court decision bearing
(00:08:05)
his name worn down by a system that
(00:08:06)
refused to accept what it had been
(00:08:08)
forced to concede. And indigenous
(00:08:11)
Americans they weren't even eligible for
(00:08:13)
citizenship until 1924. It's been only a
(00:08:16)
hundred years. And that fight was led by
(00:08:18)
this extraordinary woman named Mishik
(00:08:20)
Kales Sha, a Yankton Dakota writer and
(00:08:22)
activist who spent decades lobbying and
(00:08:24)
fighting for the Indian Citizenship Act.
(00:08:26)
Even then, it didn't guarantee the right
(00:08:28)
to vote. States retained that authority.
(00:08:30)
It wasn't until 1962 that New Mexico
(00:08:33)
finally infranchised Native Americans,
(00:08:35)
the real birthright people, last in
(00:08:37)
line.
(00:08:39)
What we're seeing now is the latest in
(00:08:40)
the regime's attempt to restore the
(00:08:42)
First Republic and all the elements of
(00:08:44)
minority rule. It's a real form of
(00:08:46)
counter resistance to the resistance to
(00:08:48)
that first republic to what the radical
(00:08:50)
Republicans in their 20th century errors
(00:08:52)
built on the 14th amendment. The rights
(00:08:55)
already succeeded with a woman's right
(00:08:56)
over her own body. They've gutted the
(00:08:58)
Voting Rights Act. They've dismantled
(00:09:00)
agency difference that let the
(00:09:01)
government actually function. They've
(00:09:02)
overturned affirmative action. And this
(00:09:04)
court has made clear it's willing to
(00:09:06)
overturn president after president. Just
(00:09:08)
this term they're considering ditching a
(00:09:10)
1935 ruling on presidential power, a
(00:09:13)
1986 election law, a 2001 campaign
(00:09:16)
finance decision. Row lasted 49 years.
(00:09:19)
Wank Mark has lasted 127. They're not
(00:09:23)
relitigating the advances of the 20th
(00:09:24)
century. They're relitigating the
(00:09:26)
outcome of the civil war. The ruling is
(00:09:28)
probably going to come down in early
(00:09:29)
July 2026, just in time for the 250th
(00:09:32)
anniversary of the Declaration of
(00:09:33)
Independence. I don't think the timing
(00:09:35)
is accidental.
(00:09:36)
>> Is it going to get worse before it gets
(00:09:37)
better, folks? Next, we're going to talk
(00:09:38)
about the vision of this regime for
(00:09:41)
national security and the way that
(00:09:42)
Europe does and doesn't fall into that.
(00:09:45)
Support for the hard right in Europe.
(00:09:47)
Oh, yeah. Let's talk about it. But more
(00:09:49)
to the point, let's do something about
(00:09:51)
it.
